site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1mo ago (text post)   2250 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for August 16, 2024

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wouldn't say "bad". Civ 1 was obviously great, even if Civ 2 was much better, and Civ 3 and Civ 5 were both good, even if both started out as "one step forward, two steps back" in comparison to their predecessors. And then Civ 6 was the first one that I didn't even think was worth upgrading to even for novelty value. (I played one copy of it, but then didn't buy several copies for family multiplayer games like I had with 5 or even encourage friends to get it for multiplayer like I had with 4)

I think the more alarming thing about the odd numbered Civ games was overreliance on expansions/DLC, which went so far as to reintroduce game mechanics that had existed in previous versions and then been omitted from the sequels' base game. Civ 3 left out multiplayer, Civ 5 left out religion and espionage. And if you find yourself having to wait to upgrade until the game is back up to par again, why not just do what I did and wait a little longer until the game is in the bargain bin?

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats