This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
How can someone with so little competitive drive that they immediately give up and start crying after a single punch (and it's not like it was so hard she fell straight to the mat or anything) even make it to the olympics in the first place? Like, you're a boxer, for chrissakes, you're still standing and your jaw's not broken, get the fuck back out there.
A woman who thinks a man is beating on her, that's who. If she has ever sparred against one during training (and why wouldn't she), Carini knows that against a legitimate male boxer (good, but not necessarily a contender) who is trying to win (even in her weight class), her options are a quick tapout and getting smashed up in potentially life-altering ways. On hearing that Khelif was XY, Carini could have concluded that she was facing a legitimate male boxer. That would probably panic her* in a way which explains her failure to fight properly before taking the big punch and rapid surrender after it.
Broadhurst, on the other hand, assumed that Khelif competing in womens' boxing implied that she was not, in fact, a legitimate male boxer (she may also not have known that there was a question about Khelif's biological sex at all), fought like someone who wanted to win and belived she could, and demonstrated that Khelif boxed like a girl.
* Real-estate guru, youth football coach and Libertarian speaker John T Reed wrote a number of articles about why you need to minimize the ability gap (which in size-based youth sports is approximately equivalent to the age gap) in youth contact sports because athletes will panic and freeze if they expect to be hit by someone a lot more dangerous than them. Unfortunately they don't seem to have made the transition to his current blog.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link