This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Wait, Hamas are mortal enemies of Assad?
Hamas moved it's political headquarters from Syria to Qatar in late 2011, at the end of the opening year of the Syrian Civil War, rather than join in on Assad's side at a time Assad was trying to pressure anyone approaching a militant group to pick a side or else. Afterwards, it generally supported Qatar's pro-Sunni-jihadist position, rhetorically and possibly with manpower/supplies it had, even as Hezbollah responded to Iranian requests to support Hezbollah.
The dispute between them wouldn't be called a feud, though there were allegations by Hezbollah that Hamas support to anti-Assad parties led to Hezbollah casualties. The Hamas-Hezbollah split was part of the basis of narrative accusations that the Syrian Civil War was an outsider ruse to split the anti-Israeli resistance, with Hamas and Hezbollah being the resistance in question.
The issue largely subsided around '13 a manner I've heard framed as 'agree to disagree,' particularly as Iran increased it's influence with Hamas via supplying it's military wing in Gaza (part of the military-political wing split in Hamas itself). By being patron to both, Hamas-in-Gaza, which is dominated by the military wing, largely stopped agitating for/ publicly supporting the anti-Assad side of the civil war.
However, to the point of being opposite sides: yes, Hamas's default response when Iran needed to invoke allies was to support Iran's enemies, not Iran. This is, and will always be, why the Hamas-Iran relationship is more transactional/utility-driven than the Hezbollah-Iran relationship.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link