site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 3, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

24
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"tankies" is a wrong way to think about it.

the best way to think about those ideologies, and the history of those ideologies, in Russia and China, is that they are explicitly nationalist ideologies.

The Chinese revolution and subsequent takeover of the country by the Communists was a direct, slightly delayed response to the failures of the previous governments during the century of humiliation. The failure to properly defend and secure the country against foreign influence and invaders is considered a primary motivation for the revolution, not some great victory of the proletariat over the robber-barons.

The Russians considered the Soviet Union an extension of Russian empire, as the Soviet Union was Russian-dominated for the longest time. The democratic revolutions and subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union are strongly linked to nationalism, with states wanting to call themselves anything other than 'comrade'.

If you're asking about why the "tankie ideology" remains popular, just go on a western college campus and talk to some humanities students for a few hours. If in a capitalistic system your worth can be measured in terms of cold, hard dollars, and your worth is intrinsically tied to the worth of the goods and services you can provide others around you, and for whatever reasons you are non-competitive...

...well, then, that's not exactly an incentive to have a pure, perfect capitalist market, is it?