This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Different kind of hate. Hillary was deeply unpopular and hated because of her personality, her disengagement and distance from the base, and her disastrous record on foreign policy (to be fair, America has a pretty poor record on foreign policy generally and it's uncertain how much of her record was her fault vs Obama's). Her failings come from her thinking that she was better than everyone else and that she knew better than everyone else ("basket of deplorables" etc.) which are also the shared failings of the Dem party elite (The Squad etc.).
Kamala is hated because she's a female politician with no clear principles who is also a naked opportunist willing to do anything to further her personal stake. The same applies to Trump to some degree, but what codes as Trump being a savvy businessman or alpha in a male context, when female-coded, comes across as Kamala looking for the next back to knife or connected boyfriend to trade up on. What ironically helps Kamala is that the Dems didn't prep for her at all so she looks a bit more of a longshot outsider, which is an advantage in an exhausted voting base sick of Business as Usual. She's also more connected to younger, idealistic voters who have yet to encounter a situation they think can't be solved by the destruction or humiliation of their political opponents.
Speaking as someone who is entirely selfish and outside America, Trump, to my great sadness, has the best record on foreign policy out of every American president since Clinton. Kamala is an unknown risk, nothing she's done personally or professionally makes me think she knows how the world of international realpolitik works beyond the reach of her own grasp. At best she's considered a harmless, ineffectual joke by other heads of state, at worst she... accidentally blunders into WW3, either egged on by the MIC, bipartisan hawks, or a complete misunderstanding of how Putin and Xi view the world.
More options
Context Copy link