This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is very similar to my mental model as well. The mugshots of this kid is one of being a terminally online NEET who was going out with a bang, not one of an ideologue. The failing of SS is gross incompetence of lazy risk-adverse officials quiet quitting to pull a paycheck off a political target they didn't care for.
Trump has been vilifed in media for years. Liberal media has been a painting him up as the next Hitler and all that, have been for years. Laws have been rewritten to allow prosecuting him.
There is an unprecedented failure of security DESPITE there allegedly being some known threat. Suspicious person is apparently spotted with a rangefinder! ,not apprehended, then had a chance to shoot off half a dozen rounds at the 'next Hitler'.
I believed the gun youtuber t-shirt photo had to be fake, because I could not believe cops would have photographed the guy at the rally and not stopped him, questioned him and removed him from the premises. Am pretty sure they can remove any suspicious person from a to be secured area ).
Turns out, they saw him with a rangefinder (no innocent explanation for that), they took a picture of him, he was on the roof of the building they were in.. it's all incredible in the true sense of the word.
Terminally online apolitical NEET gives a $15 donation to 'ActBlue'
That doesn't mesh together with 'apolitical', at all.
Also, his classmate was interviewed and said Crooks was very much political and hated Trump and called his classmate stupid when he said he liked Trump.
Watching that video of his classmate being interviewed just gave me the impression that Crooks hated politicians in general.
Since I myself hate Biden and Trump equally, I can very much sympathize with his viewpoint.
A very simple explanation for why Crooks targeted Trump rather than some other politician is that the two most prominent politicians in the US are Biden and Trump, and Trump is much easier to target than Biden because Trump constantly does outdoor appearances whereas Biden mostly stays hidden away.
It's entirely irrelevant. There's always some loner who hates people and would like to kill.
What's interesting is how it is, at all, possible that he was observed, photographed, looked for and yet ended up on a prime firing position, taking shots at the candidate without being stopped by security.
Or why his social media are not all over the place. Is the trans angle real or just someone playing around with genAI ? etc.
More options
Context Copy link
Simple, but low prior. I got ChatGPT to list 30 notorious modern assassination attempts. Of those, all or almost all that come close to fitting the bill were by people with a history of (severe) mental illness. The only anecdote the classmate gave had Crooks calling him stupid for supporting Trump. Both the fact that he is a Trump supporter and that the target of the attempt was Trump make that fact less conspicuous, but still... maybe the simplest explanation for an assailant risking his life to assassinate one of the most hated candidates ever is that he hated that candidate in particular.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Sounds like he hated all politicians.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link