Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 44
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Okay, my St Peter's digital fast is over. I avoided you, Reddit and other useless websites, with YT remaining the only shameful exception.
I even did some actual reading. I think I asked you people once if there was a serious gender-swapped noir detective novel that wasn't a novella inside Hyperion for a project of mine that I will probably never even start, and got no real replies.
However, I don't remember how, but just before my digital fast I found Hardboiled and High Heeled: The Woman Detective in Popular Culture by Linda Mizejewski. That was what I was looking for: someone who has done all the legwork for me. I cracked open the epub and started reading.
I came out the other end with three things: a weird disgust at the level of girl-crush the author had on Clarissa Starling, a surprise that shouldn't have been one at the fact lesbian detective fiction exists, and a list of authors that I was going to check out.
Major caveat: my wife reads mystery stories with a fucking notepad, listing all clues and trying to solve the case before the writer gets to it. I think it's masochism, I look at the tropes and try to use my guts. If I guess right, then I pat myself on the back. If I don't, I don't care. So don't expect me to evaluate how good these novels are as mystery fiction.
Step one: Sara Paretsky and her novels Indemnity Only and Deadlock, with V.I. Warshawski as the PI
Good tropes:
Inverted tropes:
Of all the authors, it's the one I might keep reading.
Step two: Sue Grafton and her novel A is for Alibi, with Kinsey Millhone as the PI
Good tropes:
A town in Middle California is one of the most middle-class locations you can think of, not enough city to have an actual underbelly. I might try the B novel just in case, but it's not what I was looking for.
Step three: Marcia Muller and her novel Edwin of the Iron Shoes, with Sharon McCone as the PI
I dropped this novel after just one chapter, as Sharon was a company investigator, not a private one. That's why there were two Paretsky novels on my list.
Step four: Linda Barnes and her novel The Trouble of Fools, with Carlotta Carlyle as the PI
I haven't got to this one yet, but the blurbs look promising.
Step five: G.G. Fickling and their novel This Girl For Hire, with Honey West as the PI
That's definitely not noir, but maybe some sexploitation mystery fiction will help me too? Again, haven't gotten to it yet.
Only books I can think of are the 'Blood' series by Tanya Huff, who's also apparently a lesbian. Or at least married to a woman. It's kinda... noir-ish, maybe. Definitely not a sunny optimistic kind of novel. Protagonist is an up & coming successful detective, gets an incurable eye disease and is relegated to desk work only, so she quits and goes private. It's a urban fantasy, of the 'hidden world' subtype, where supernatural is very lightly present and not acknowledged by the authorities.
Funnily enough, there are some romance elements - e.g. the vampire who's a side character is a historical period romance novelist (easy gig if you lived thru it) , and later on in the series there's a hetero romance subplot.
More options
Context Copy link
My approach to my wife's thrillers has always been closer to yours. She's gotten laughing-annoyed enough at me guessing right through raw trope assumptions that I prefer to hold who I'm thinking in until she finishes.
Your genre requirements are pretty tight. A ton of these thrillers have women becoming investigators through necessity or interest instead of being a professional to kick things off. Have you dipped into the wider pool at all, or do you find it insufferable?
Like Gideon the prophet, I don't want to deal with a wide pool.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link