AvocadoPanic
No bio...
User ID: 550
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
Yes, also Lutherans and Reformed (Calvinist).
Competing egregores slander and compete with each other.
Looking at the outcomes of sexual degeneracy, idolatry, and multiculturalism for many choosing traditional Christianity is better than culture of current year, as it was better than acient paganism.
I'd expect turning away from sin to produce better outcomes, I wouldn't expect it to be popular amongst the unrepentant .
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
They're German but very pre-1850 and heavily / mostly Protestant.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
I showed you the dozen abject failures of assimilation in a 60 mile radius around me, especially with my color commentary of how they used to be
I would watch and support this podcast. Would you call it 'Decline and Fall', 'Managed Decline', 'Back When the Lights Were On'?
Do you think women would watch like they watch true crime informative murder porn?
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
usually the richest demographic, often fighting Jews and the Chinese for pole position
This is just bad in the other direction. Importing a new elite class to rule over the native middle and bottom isn't really an improvement. Many places already struggle with nepotism prone foreign elites with divided loyalties.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
Palatine German immigration to the USA began around ~1709, it reached its height from the 1720 - 1750.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
People are largely horrible. The pressure keeps them from being as horrible. Remove the pressure and people become more horrible and more people become horrible.
As a social / civilizational technology it's produced better outcomes for those that have used it.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
Trans ideology and transhumanist ideals seem more likely to lead to suicide than immortality. Personal and cultural / civilizational suicide. This shouldn't be surprising that the wages of sin is death, has been long known.
Natural state of health just means free of pathology, physical and mental.
To me this sounds like the sort of rationalization you hear from people non-compliant with their meds or treatment.
Many bipolar people enjoy the mania, anorexics like losing weight. Their family and doctors just want them 'normal' and fat.
If wanting the goal of medical treatment to be a return to a natural state of health is a rejection of 'transhumanist ideals', ok.
this is about trans people, the original comment is about homosexuality
If you're opposed to degeneracy and degenerates this is a distinction without a difference.
If you're opposed to degeneracy and degenerates this is a distinction without a difference.
Edit 1
Despite the ban, there is no 'boo outgroup' here. The distinction being made is only relevant to their 'in group'. I'm not sure if there's some qualitative claimed difference between this particular sort of trans grooming vs. non-trans homosexual grooming. The grooming is the objectionable behavior regardless of the specific sort of devients undertaking the grooming.
Unless and until someone wants to make an effort post on non-trans homosexual grooming being less bad or different than trans grooming I stand by it being a distinction without a difference.
Edit 2
It's not railing about degeneracy at best it's observing and noticing. Nor sadly in current year is it exclusive to homosexuals or other sexual minorities, western culture is largely awash in sexual degeneracy and perversion of all sorts. Homosexuals and other sexual minorities seem especially over represented in education and schools. I don't see anything uncivil in the original or subsequent edits.
'Sexual Degeneracy' is not untactful it's an accurate description of the behavior undertaken by a cohort that frequently attempts to destigmatize the behavior in an ongoing effort to appeal to youth. It's not even the sort of coarse language I'd avoid in mixed company. There are an assortment of uncivil terms to apply to this cohort.
The mod action here was boo outgroup.
If others complain about mod actions for language maybe you should collectively be more precise and explicit about the sort of language you don't want.
I suspect you know I hate sexual degenerates grooming youth. Even when I've not used uncivil language to describe the degeneracy you suspect I'm thinking uncivil things about this cohort and railing against them.
As a former sexual degenerate, I suspect I know this cohort better than you.
Once we're in the territory of 'magic pills' why not have the pill allow them to be happy with their natal bodies?
Would your magic pill for anorexia help them loose weight or keep them alive without eating?
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
republican and the trans activist might share a similar terminal goal: "all people should feel comfortable with their gender identity".
Maybe these are Uniparty Republicans. The Republicans in my circle think gender identity is fake and gay. That people who are uncomfortable with their bodies are mentally ill neurotics and to the extent it's a belief that's 'sincere', insane people believe and internalize all sorts of crazy.
I won't vouch for the accuracy; Grok produced this transcript
[15:36] David: Alright, let’s shift gears a little bit here. One of the big things that came out of the first day of the Trump administration was the executive order on birthright citizenship. This has been a hot topic for a long time, especially in conservative circles. John, you’ve written extensively about this. Can you break down what this executive order does and why you think it’s legally sound?
John: Sure, David. First off, let me say this is something we’ve been pushing for years—decades, really—at the Claremont Institute and elsewhere. The executive order Trump signed on day one basically says that children born in the U.S. to parents who are here illegally, or even on temporary visas, aren’t automatically citizens. It’s directing federal agencies to stop issuing citizenship documents—like passports or Social Security numbers—to those kids unless at least one parent is a citizen or a lawful permanent resident.
Now, the legal basis here hinges on the 14th Amendment, specifically the Citizenship Clause: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” The key phrase is “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” For over a century, the courts—and most scholars—have read that broadly, saying if you’re born here, you’re a citizen, period. Except for, you know, diplomats’ kids or invading armies. But that’s a misreading of the original intent.
When the 14th Amendment was drafted in 1866, the framers—like Senator Jacob Howard—made it clear they meant it to apply to people who owe full allegiance to the United States. That’s freed slaves, citizens, people permanently domiciled here. Not foreigners who are just passing through or breaking the law to get here. Howard said explicitly it doesn’t include “persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers.” The debate in Congress backs this up— they weren’t trying to hand out citizenship to every kid born on U.S. soil no matter the circumstances.
Viva: Wait, John, hold on a sec. The counterargument I always hear is that Wong Kim Ark case from 1898 settled this. Guy born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants—legal ones, sure—but the Supreme Court said he’s a citizen. Doesn’t that blow your theory out of the water?
John: Not at all, Viva. Wong Kim Ark is the big cudgel everyone swings, but it’s narrower than people think. Wong’s parents were lawful residents—here legally, running a business, fully subject to U.S. jurisdiction in the political sense. The court said he’s a citizen because his parents weren’t diplomats or some hostile force; they were part of the community. But the case didn’t address illegal immigrants or temporary visitors. The justices even said the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction” means full allegiance—owing no allegiance to another country.
Illegal immigrants, by definition, aren’t fully subject to our jurisdiction—they’re subject to deportation, not the draft, for example. They owe allegiance to their home countries. Same with tourists or visa holders. Wong Kim Ark doesn’t cover them, and the Supreme Court’s never ruled on that specific question. This executive order is teeing it up for them to finally decide.
David: So you’re saying this is a test case, basically? Trump’s throwing it out there to force the courts to weigh in?
John: Exactly. Look, the left’s already suing—18 states filed challenges within days. They’re screaming it’s unconstitutional, but that’s the point: let’s get it to the Supreme Court. The historical record’s on our side. Senator Lyman Trumbull, another key framer, said “subject to the jurisdiction” means “not owing allegiance to anybody else.” That’s not some fringe view—Ed Meese, Reagan’s AG, signed onto a brief I wrote years ago saying the same thing. If the court looks at the original meaning, not the lazy gloss we’ve had since the 20th century, Trump’s order holds up.
Viva: Alright, but practically speaking, John—what’s this mean for people? Like, babies born tomorrow to undocumented parents. They just… don’t get a birth certificate?
John: Not quite. They’ll still get a birth certificate—that’s a state thing, recording the birth. But federal agencies won’t issue citizenship papers. No Social Security number, no passport. States might try to fight it, issue their own stuff, but the feds control naturalization under the Constitution. It’ll create chaos short-term, sure—hospitals, parents, bureaucrats scrambling. But that’s the pressure point to get this resolved. Long-term, it’s about ending the magnet of illegal immigration. People won’t trek here to pop out a kid for an anchor baby if it doesn’t work anymore.
David: Fascinating. And you’re not worried about the optics? I mean, it’s a tough sell—denying citizenship to kids born here. Sounds harsh to a lot of folks.
John: Optics are Trump’s problem, not mine. I’m looking at the law and history. The 14th Amendment wasn’t a blank check for anyone to exploit. It’s been twisted into this universal giveaway, and that’s not what it says. If people don’t like it, amend the Constitution—good luck getting two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states. Until then, this order’s a valid interpretation. Let the courts sort it out.
[18:45] Viva: Alright, John, we could go all day on this—fascinating stuff. Let’s pivot to something else…
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
3rd day of the Russian intervention, this was not the start.
The eastern provinces had already been fighting by the time Russia finally intervened. They were already Russian they made it official later.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
Don't orphans already have enough problems without being dropped into some sort of homosexual family life LARP? I'd rather be in an orphanage / orphanarium.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
I would say aesthetics rather than optics.
This sort of behavior seems to me to attempt to wear the skin suit of natural normal male desire.
To see the consequences of your union, your wife swelling with your child. New life brought forth as you participate in the continuing glory of God's creation.
This is not that. This feels more like a sacrifice to Molach or a grotesque distorted simulacra of normal healthy desire
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
If they're persecuting the Novorussians in the civil war it's part of the intervention, especially so after Novorussian became part of the federation.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
If you're hunting nazis you have to go where the nazis and their leadership are.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
greeted as liberators
They were by the Novorussians.
I think this largely depends if you view this conflict as an unprovoked war of Russian aggression or a Russian intervention in a Ukrainian civil war on behalf of ethnic Russians experiencing persecution by Ukrainian nationalists.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
Isn't this a solved problem?
I'm sure I've seen footage of automated chicken processing in the Netherlands or Germany.
For example https://youtube.com/watch?v=QIciSPOm1h0
No AI required.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
Hopefully a cure will be discovered, or at least effective treatment options.
AvocadoPanic
1mo ago
Do you mean immorality in general, beatiality, homosexual anal sex, or something else?
I'd likely condemn sodomy.
Both are the opposition. Does it matter that for the trans it's egg cracking and for the homosexuals it's
groomingacceptance / pride? Not really, for both it's indoctrination into sexual degeneracy. I've yet to hear a convincing argument that there are differences other than degree or semantics. Certainly were we to parse out all of the various degeneracies or comorbidities and plot them on a venn diagram for any individual in this cohort there would be much overlap for those on this spectrum of degeneracy.In the same sense it does not matter you're a balloon fetishist but don't pop them and think the balloon poppers are not true looners.
It may matter in some intra-sexual degeneracy hierarchy but for those on the outside the inner political drama of quarreling foreign tribes is of little consequence, all are the enemy.
More options
Context Copy link