TitaniumButterfly
No bio...
User ID: 2854
Yeah but RDR2 wants to be taken seriously as literature. I wouldn't expect that from GTA6 and if it's what they're doing it's a bad move.
Right but my question is how the judge is going to view the matter.
The beedrill queen's thoracic plates retracted, revealing millions of glistening eggs. She was two months old.
An interesting edge case is that of fictional child porn such as hand-drawn pornography of various disney princesses and other underage cartoon characters.
How old even is the Snorlax pokémon? And do depictions of sex acts with fictional animals count as bestiality?
I mean, personally I think porn of real people should simply be illegal (outside of private production and consumption i.e. it's okay to take naked pictures of your spouse and enjoy them).
But in terms of a compromise within our current legal and social frameworks, yes, I think it makes sense to allow for AI-generated content so long as it's not derived from actual CSAM. Not healthy for the user, but that occurs to me as their problem, and I have no reason to believe it would make them more likely to actually engage in abuse.
And then there's written or drawn erotica which should also -- again I say in compromise with the current framework -- be unconstrained IMO. The idea that it should be illegal to write about or draw... pretty much anything strikes me as ludicrous. Especially given the ambiguity (re: age, etc.) inherent in many such works.
Because it's hard to fuck in a fursuit without getting heatstroke?
So that's why it seems so much more common in Nordic countries!
I'm definitely not comfortable with AI content trained on actual cp. That feels like extending the abuse of the victim into eternity.
Amen.
I don't think this single data point is evidence for much of anything.
However, almost every single vid I've seen of a cop panicking and shooting somebody inappropriately has been a woman. Including stuff like the one where she meant to grab her taser but got flustered and pulled her gun and shot him instead. And that would seem to support your point.
The Catholic scandals took off because they involved positions of trust.
See, I think it's more to do with 1. hypocrisy ("these people claim to be arbiters of morality but look at how they actually behave") and 2. popular anti-Christian sentiment.
People who love to complain about the clerical abuse scandal never seem interested in talking about, e.g., the higher prevalence of such abuse in public schools, despite it being another example of abuse of positions of trust. That's just not what's interesting.
Hijacking a little here but my understanding is that actual right-wing parties are forming in Europe now -- at least right-wing enough to mention the possibility of remigration -- and I'm wondering what's going to happen once that catches on, even as it belatedly occurs to them that, due to the migrant voting bloc, democratic solutions are permanently off the table.
When will that realization happen? And what happens then?
Where did you get any of that from what he said? You've basically imputed all of your own imaginings onto...
This is her whole thing. She hallucinates stuff to get indignant over and then mocks anyone who objects by implying they're too dumb or insecure (or whatever) to see her point.
And "the cops showed up" in parentheses and also that doesn't happen in the video
How I wish Project Wingman were opened up so the community could make maps and missions! It's basically the only game I use VR for.
And a mind-reader too! Will the wonders never cease?
You're wrong and sad and bitter and I'm sick of seeing you around.
This is just polygamy where the patriarch has a yuri fetish. Feminists think it should be illegal and polyamory never works out like that.
I knew a situation where an older guy (maybe 60s) was living with two amerindian sisters in their 20s, providing for and sleeping with them both. Wonder if it's easier with sisters. Though to be honest I highly doubt any of them had ever heard the word 'polyamory'. The vibe was much more Great Frontier mountain man finds himself in the not-entirely-unpleasant situation of caring for two Shoshoni gals cut off from their tribe.
To be fair I've never seen any 'burlesque' that didn't consist entirely of glaringly-unattractive women, and that per se would be enough to have me disappointed and disgusted in my hypothetical son. Overlooking the lack of talent among the 'dancers' due to some kind of sick fascination with the aesthetic scans to me as similar to an extreme foot fetish or unhealthy obsession with The Rocky Horror Picture Show or something. Not something you want to see surface in your child.
The point about "but it's not my sister" is the same as "but I did have my breakfast this morning". He can't see the girls on the television as people, they're just there as the framework to which the things he is interested in - bouncing boobs, ass, maybe a hint of more private parts - is attached, they're not persons in their own right.
I never cease to be amazed at how sure you are of your kneejerk imaginings, while also refusing to listen to anyone who tries to help correct you. Once again I'll just say openly that I don't even know why you're here, except that you seem to get a lot of sick enjoyment out of hysterically, but inappropriately, reacting to people who aren't even saying what you'd love to hate them to be saying.
Here you've pattern-matched to a meme that is not applicable (I considered and answered the hypothetical before pointing out it wasn't pertinent) and completely ass-pulled the part about not seeing attractive women as 'persons in their own right'. In fact I do see attractive women as people, and also enjoy looking at them sexually. You're consistently straightforward in admitting that you don't understand this experience at all, so it's just wild to me that you're willing to baselessly impute the worst possible motive to others without any leg to stand on whatsoever.
I award you a downvote and may God have mercy on your soul.
You'll note that I answered her hypothetical before pointing out that it wasn't relevant.
Yeah the juggies were part of the main show shot before a studio audience, whereas the girls jumping on trampolines were filmed separately and then just spliced in as a segment. Though for all I know there was substantial overlap between the two groups.
Women on Trampolines
Girls Jumping On Trampolines.
My mom saw me watching that once (I'd have been 17 probably) and got angry and demanded to know how I'd feel if it were my sister jumping on the trampoline.
I told her I wouldn't be interested in watching my sister, but these women were not my sister. We looked at each other for a bit and then she left.
The men of Victorian Britain were straightforward in their class bias and sincerely believed the lower classes were fundamentally-distinct in terms of inclination and potential, and talked about this openly.
Obviously everyone still understands this on some level but in the current context it must be denied at least publicly, and I'm surprised to find that such attitudes persist to such a degree as to result in the lack of outrage we see today.
And yet the same logic isn't applied to immigrants? I'm not trying to be cute when I say that this confuses me.
Like, I can throw cynical epicycles at the problem (something something signaling) but at some point I'm just speculating and every answer seems to raise further questions.
Vibecamp seems to cater to people who delight in sexual transgression per se.
I agree with both of you. Shrug
- Prev
- Next

Wrong thread? I think you meant the Friday Fun Thread.
More options
Context Copy link