@Throwaway05's banner p

Throwaway05


				

				

				
2 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 January 02 15:05:53 UTC

				

User ID: 2034

Throwaway05


				
				
				

				
2 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 January 02 15:05:53 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2034

He has a specific interpersonal style that many, many people have been able to figure out to mutual and individual benefit.

His opposition generally seems to refuse to engage (often because it generates easy political gains) and abandons their professionalism.

Maybe it shouldn't be, but the American presidency effectively represents the boss of the free world. When you get a new boss you got to adjust to the boss, refusing to do so is not wise.

Again I'd be very happy in a world where Trump has the ability to create a broad tent and big decisions can be discussed robustly from a variety of perspectives. This world does not exist and it's not his fault. He can't make it exist - if you want it to exist you need to encourage the people and leaders to create the necessary conditions for it to be.

Yes I am very much aware that many people here are not happy about current events.

What is the plan? Let Iran nuclearize and then start attacking everyone else in the region with drones and missiles and cause economic chaos by blocking Hormuz? That's pretty much what they want to do. They aren't shy about their geopolitical goals.

Doing nothing is a decision - it's easy to justify to yourself in a trolley problem kind of way but that doesn't mean it is safe or a good idea.

I'm not truly sure if it is a good idea or not, probably not - but I have a strong suspicion that one of the things Trump is up to is to try and convince undecideds it is a great idea.

Also attacking Iran was necessary and inevitable and everyone is just trying to posture and leave the US holding the bag. It is so tiresome.

Iran has not behaved consistently rationally. Random firing at nearby civilian targets is rational in the sense that it could be part of their strategic posture and pure evil, but some of the attacks (like on Azerbaijan and Diego Garcia) are clearly unfocused nonsense with negative benefit.

At absolute best they are irrational in the sense that degradation of their command and control has impaired their ability to coherently follow their war plan.

The point is that there is no benefit with consensus building with Europe because you know in advance Europe is going to oppose it regardless of if it's a good idea.

The old "if Trump cured cancer you'd see pro-cancer rallies in the street" vibe is true.

Our allies and the opposition party have made very clear that teamwork and discussion is not valuable so now the Trump U.S. doesn't bother and it's not his (or our) fault.

He loves deals and working together! In many ways he is one of the easier presidents to manage, you just have to hold your nose...but people can't.

Ultimately Europe has made discussing with Europe a completely unfruitful endeavor.

Some others have hit on this but it's worth emphasizing - it's very possible the plan was to get nukes and then start bombing SA/Israel/Europe and/or closing Hormuz with a nuclear backstop.

Iran is not a rational actor. It is not North Korea. NK just wants to be left alone and engage in enough international crime to stay solvent. Iran has serious regional and religious goals it is willing to pursue at absurd cost.

It can't be allowed to have the bomb.

Without consulting anyone, without giving a shit about the rest of the world,

This is why I generally don't think Trump is the problem. The response to Trump is almost always worse than Trump. TDS is not Trump's fault. He occasionally does stuff that's legit bad but usually it's just "being blue collar" or "non-Western diplomatic norms coming from a Westerner."

For a decade now people in authority have committed to kicking, screaming, and abandoning professionalism and cooperation in response to anything Trump does.

Usually the political benefits have seemed good enough to make people think that's a good idea but this is a very serious example of how that was always stupid.

As we talked about before the motivation for this misadventure is probably something like "okay the drone and missile production is starting to get to the point where doing something is going to become mandatory or will turn forever impossible."

Getting support for something like this after the second Iraq war would be incredibly hard. With Trump at the helm? Impossible. European leaders would probably try and actively sabotage it.

The U.S. runs off on its own because TDS made compromise and cooperation impossible.

We see this domestically in the US all the time. Trump is happy to make a deal, but the Dems will maximally complain no matter what he does, so he doesn't bother and just does what he wants.

A big piece of what is happening is European leaders abandoning professionalism for personal reasons or to score easy domestic policy points (looking at you Spain) and potentially doing profound damage to the structure and economy of Europe in the process.

I also strongly suspect Trump is doing a side game with this (and with Greenland and other things) to bail out of NATO and Europe is playing right into his hands.

The problem with Shakespeare is that he's (really well done) junk food that was so good and foundational that it has aged into literary prominence.

This causes problems - he has a lot of just funny shit, low brow humor, and satisfying basic chicken soup plotting (think Star Wars original trilogy). The facet of "you" that can enjoy Billy without engaging in classiness masturbation is the low brow blockbuster side of things.

But because most modern people require a reference guide or really turning their brains on they'll try and engage in a more "literary" way.

Those two things end up hitting at cross purposes.

The end result is that the most rewarding way is experience - know it well enough that you don't need to think really hard to realize that something someone just said was an upscale dick joke.

This is not helpful because a good response to "ehh I'm doubting" is not "watch it 50 times."

I guess I would recommend trying to see a stage version after recently having struggled through the written, and then just trying to vibe with the play.

This is not a criticism:

I wonder if dislike of post-modernism and dissatisfaction with Ama's post are tied together.

A bit of a meander, with much attention paid to form and structure, tendencies and purpose (and the meta of popularity in writing etc) - that shit is all post-modern as fuck.

Clarity and getting to the fucking point has a ton of value. So does taking a big ass puff of the reefer and going "hey man but what about..."

If you are more the former (especially when it comes to the domain of art and writing) some of this shit is going to seem like purposeless masturbation. Which it is to some extent! It has value also tho.

This could be any of a million medical or psychiatric things or nothing at all. Good reminder to keep up with your routine health maintenance with your primary care doctor.

You probably didn't mean it this way but a true feeling of imminent doom is an actual thing and requires urgent medical attention (can signal things like a heart attack, and one specific medicine causes it as a side effect).

You may have dodged a bullet with something, or you just might have had some excess anxiety and not been super familiar with it.

For the purposes of this being a comment on the internet I can't really ethically recommend anything other than urgent presentation to the ED, especially if it reoccurs or if anything else seems to be going wrong with your body.

That said spontaneous anxiety happens - people get sleep apnea, or panic attacks start (they have to start sometime).

OP - I will not read your comment, if I read your comment I'll be somewhat constrained in what kind of advice I can give.

I did read the other comments, so I can say this generically about crisis resources:

-You can always call 911. 911 is not just the police, it's a consolidated place to access crisis resources. This is easy to forget with all the anti-police rhetoric and so on but it's an option. In small towns responders will be less practiced but they will be far more local. In large places they'll be very practiced even if they are unhelpful.

Realistically the worst thing that can happen is they'll give you another number to call and hang up. Not a bad outcome.

Sidebar: 988 exists, it's the psychiatric version of 911. Not sure how helpful it would be for this use case but it's good for patients to be aware.

-Most people don't know a psychiatrist, but most people know a nurse or a doctor. Assuming it's a reasonable hour for your relationship you can call and ask for more local specific advice, advice for this specific situation, and so on. If it is someone who doesn't really know (like say, an ortho surgeon or a new grad nurse) they will usually know somebody they can reach out to for more specifics.

-Crisis Centers/Hospitals: Much more variable but many jurisdictions in the U.S. will have mental health specific resources that can be contacted for wellness checks and the like. Sometimes this is as easy as calling the local ED and asking for the Psych ED. Sometimes you google "country psychiatric screening center" and you get a specific 24/7 number for your jurisdiction.

-If the person has a doctor and a bunch of other things line up right (like it being business hours) you can call the office. In a pinch you can call an unrelated doctor's office and ask for local psych resources which is rudeish but completely reasonable.

I saw one of the other poster's mention bipolar. Most people who say they have bipolar do not actually have bipolar. If someone really has bipolar it's important to have a conversation with them when they are well compensated about their wishes for when they are ill. They might not agree when ill, but at least you can attempt to carry out their wishes. If not bipolar - it's important to get a "real" diagnosis, with treatment and therapy resources.

Two caveats:

-Calling for help when someone is unwell can create a lot of angst. If it persists when the crisis is over, you need to have a conversation.

-"Help" has some obligations with respect to welfare of children, threats to a person's life, and so on. These are usually very narrow but they do exist. This should NEVER stop you from calling for help, but you should be aware of this.

From what I can tell the DC insider consensus is FUCK TRUMP ...and also.....we need a ballroom....

I don't think we are dying but I do think we are losing interesting people and shrinking in variety.

One of the nice parts of anime is how much easier it is to use unreality to engage with themes and so on. Someone seems more dominant in a conversation? Make them a little bigger than they usually are/everyone else. For more stylized ones...make them A LOT bigger.

You can play with those tricks in a way that's much harder with live action.

Should we make a try at returning to Reddit in search of new blood?

The environment is different now over there.

I was there. I saw it happen. I watched people die.

The amount of brain dead conspiracy theory energy generated by people who can't imagine a world in which different things happened to other people who are not them is deeply concerning.

Was he high? He might have been literally baked out of his mind, he often is on the pod I think.

Got 295.

Most points lost on cultural knowledge ;_;

Also did not read the instructions and it took a couple before I realized it was supposed to be 5.

Hmmm yes that makes sense.

I do think you have real room to argue that the water carrying becomes something in truth especially once protesting happens, and sometimes voting - if you vote for the jew-killing party then you share some culpability when they do it, and anti-Israel is a large part of the Dems these days regardless of if they want it. It's not an incidental aspect.

Left-wing bleeding hearts who haven't

I was originally going to agree with Amadan but then you reminded me these people existed - however in my experience they tend to act like information less wokes who can't discuss the situation at all or provide any solutions, only suggest that Israel is bad and should go away. In this way they carry water for the actual anti-semites.

Yes! Trump is legacy motivated and he knows that without some major shake up he's going to spend the rest of his time in office being impeached repeatedly.

This might not save him from the midterms, but it may buy him a legacy he wants.

Ugh, perhaps you are right.

This one feels like a Socratic Gadfly dying to me more than some of the other flame outs, perhaps that's what bothers me.

I've done everything I can to help, and he doesn't see himself as being in need of help. That's the Russian way.

Ugh so true.

So that's the startling part - the Iranians I know are hellaciously pro-Trump and pro bombing Iran. They claim this is widely held with the country.

I imagine it will change as things progress, but it is true for now. That says something about how bad the regime is and it's one of the reasons I get frustrated with the discussion here.

One of my friends tells stories about how every day walking home from work she'd worry about wandering into a pop-up protest (and had done so) and then feeling for her life to avoid getting executed.

She is a nervous type, but that's a scary way to live.

I think there are arguments on both sides for this being a win for Russia and China vs. loss, but we aren't going to know until well after the fact.

If Iran collapses that's a loss for instance. Sources in the military are saying that part of our posture is to show off assets to Russia and China, if China does not invade Taiwan because of this misadventure we may not find out about it until decades later.

On the other hand if they go now it becomes a bit more obvious it was an own goal.