crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
No bio...
User ID: 111
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
1d ago
No, I'm not going to engage on your terms, because I have basic pattern-recognition ability. If I bring up an example, you're going to make up excuses on how your Jewposting isn't Jewposting and you having a Really Good Point that no one else seems to recognize.
I know a redditor gotcha when I see one. Your infinite capacity to waste other people's time and never admit fault does not make you any more correct.
You're unironically behaving like the Jews from Mein Kampf that Hitler so despised, who would be refuted of their nonsense day after day and return without a trace of shame repeating the same lies.
You know what you did, you clever Hebrew you.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
2d ago
And there's no point, because reducto ad iudaeus. If the root cause is the Jews, then debating the various means of how the Jews are at fault is both limited and uninteresting. (You allege they act through the WEF, I allege they act through the WTO: is there really a material difference to our positions?) And if they're not the root cause, and you refuse to accept that possibility, then what, exactly, are we debating?
I can't prove a null hypothesis. I can't prove that Jews aren't behind everything and there is no evidence that that possibly could. You may think yourself in an unassailable position but what you are really doing is being a bore that only talks about the Jews. There is no point debating you because you refuse to change your mind in the face of evidence to the contrary - or your standard of proof is so unrealistically high that nothing will convince you otherwise.
So, for emphasis: what is there possibly to debate, when all of your propositions end with the same conclusion? Don't try and squirm out of this, you reprehensible degenerate. Having the same answer to every question is not a superpower. 'The Jews Did It' is your only position of any substance, and I'm calling you out.
That's not a fact that can be debated on its terms: it's a strongly held belief on your part. And I can't reason you out of a belief or debate you into changing it. So sack up and do your big post on How The Jews Did It in the main thread: show us your revisionist history so the whole community can tear it apart.
If you can't, or don't want to, then shut the fuck up.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
2d ago
If you feel that you're the prophet in the wilderness in this, then you are obviously not here to debate, but to preach: and are self-evidentially an unserious person. There's really no good reason to seriously consider anything you have to say because you have a monomaniacal zeal on this one topic that you will never give ground on.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
2d ago
Yes, yes. Finally the recognition I deserve.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
2d ago
If I wanted to talk to an AI, I'd have it emulate the persona of a big-titted anime bimbo who aims to flatter and please me, and not the median poster of the Motte. QED.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
2d ago
Your protest rings hollow because you can seemingly not talk about any subject without bringing them up!
I challenge you to go a month - even a week! - without connecting the subject at hand to the perfidy and scheming of the Hebrew race. And this is a challenge that I believe you will fail because my Noticing powers didn't just stop at FBI statistics.
Give me some credit. Don't treat me like I'm stupid. I don't understand why you have to keep up a pretense when you obviously have an agenda. Heck, I even agree with you sometimes. But you're the Jew guy. You talk about Jews. That's what you're known for. You're the Semitic Outrage Poster. The Israel News Hour. The Rabbi Amber Alert. You have 1400 posts in your history that are strong evidence that this is the case.
If you're going to try and evade this, even after that, against repeated interaction and very public history of such behaviour, that is probably the most Jewish thing anyone has ever done on the Motte.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
2d ago
You having to resort to prompt generation to not Jewpost is not the defense you imagine it is.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
4d ago
Although that may be true, there is a nonzero (read: 99.9999%) chance that you are a obnoxious bore.
I've been censured for waging the culture war myself, but I'd like to flatter myself and think I do so in a creative way. You going "DAE, anyone think that the left are useless mouth parasites" is lazy redditism and is cringe and even though I AGREE WITH YOU I still think that your contribution is worthless.
This isn't a Facebook boomer thread. Have some class.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
5d ago
If you are earnestly a righty and on my partisan side: stop it. You're making us look stupid and you are convincing no one.
What I do suspect, however, is that you are trolling, and are in fact a lefty posting ostensibly righty positions and trying to get a gotcha of hypocrisy. No one is fooled. You could put what you have posted so far in a partisan mirror and nothing about its content or valence would substantially change. How do I know? Uh, righties don't use the term 'fascist' or 'brainworm' like you do, and your references to an objective truth are absent of any reference to God.
Either case does not reflect well on you.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
6d ago
The mythical man month applies to human reproduction, in that nine men and one women can only make a single baby a year, no matter how hard the men work in vigorously impregnating her. If you think that men are the sex that is the bottleneck of babymaking then you are very silly. What are we supposed to do? Wait for the girlbosses to deign to save the human race? Why aren't they doing it already?
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
11d ago
Would you tell me your date of birth and your real life location, so I may mislead and deceive the public into the regular occurance of me shooting your foot?
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
11d ago
Ok, fine. The UK isn't a place where people get arrested for saying perfectly innocent things online. It's a place where underage girls are regularly raped by gangs of Pakistanis who kidnap and imprison them. Is that acceptable? Or would you say that is misleading, as well?
Don't play games with language. If something that shouldn't happens happens with a frequency of more than once per year, it's fine to call it 'regularly'. If I came to your house and shot your in the foot on your birthday every year, people would say that it is a regular occurrence, and wouldn't equivocate to 'misleading' or 'outright false'. I either shot your foot, or I didn't. It's not something you can smear with a narrative slight of hand.
A smart partisan would have found all sorts of technical excuses to give the paper a low grade: certainly, there would be a pretext for it. But a zero is so transparently unwarranted that it became blatantly obvious that it is discrimination. The professor in question would have gotten away with it, if it was merely a year ago. But it is now, and universities can no longer cover for such behavior under the chud-occupied bureaucracy.
You think that being so schooled in civil rights history, academics could detect an obvious Rosa Parks coming their way. But clearly, the intellectual standards at the academy have been slipping broadly as to fall for such an trap. Progressives are ill-suited to holding institutional power because they cannot imagine themselves holding it - it is antithetical to their whole ethos. So when when they do, they act clumsily and overtly, smugly confident that there will be no consequences for unsubtle tyranny. They are wrong, and this is a consequence long overdue.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
21d ago
I refuse to accept responsibility for Khalistan. Khalistan happened because stupid Indian politicians commanded their army stormed their holy of holies. India has exported this problem to my country. This does not please me. Just because white people are stupid enough to let the problem does not make me any happier - or more willing to accept the blame.
If you invite a guest into your house, and they have recently come from a fight, and wish to continue it, the host can ask them to leave, and not get involved. This is common sense. No, I don't have to become a citizen of the world. No, I don't have to accept tribal fighting from Bumfuckistan or grudges from the Actual Country They're Loyal To. They can go and sing their song of letting their brother, their cousin, their uncle, their entire Bollywood backup dancer squad into other people's countries.
If they are a net benefit to the people who are here, and cause no trouble? Good. If not, kick them out! That is a good opinion, a universal opinion. I don't need statistics to back that one up. For the same reason you don't want infinity Muslims in India, I don't want infinity Indians in my country. If that is not sufficient to clear things up, others will explain in my stead.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
21d ago
To be blunt to the point of ungraciousness, I do not care. What I mean is that I really don't care about old world ethnic grievances coming to the new. India sending assassins through their embassies to deal with their separatists is, definitionally, not what a model minority gets up to. I don't get into knife fights with Japanese or mainland Chinese or Koreans in Canada. I come to this country, founded by Anglos, and I cause no trouble. I speak their language and respect their values.
And that is not what the Indians are doing.
When Indians show up to fight with the Pakistanis on the streets of London, one must think of the native Britons, who think to themselves: how the hell is this my problem? I am forced to have a opinion on Khalistan, on Kashmir, because loud and rude foreigners come over and make it my problem in Canada. Indians are not a model minority. I'm not demonizing them. They bring trouble to the country I was born in. As an Chinese-Canadian, my opinion of them is very low for good reason. If they want to be a model minority, they can change how they goddamn behave.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
21d ago
Model minorities don't systematically exploit food banks or run trucks into school buses filled with hockey players or come on student visas for fake degrees while working minimum wage jobs. To be blunt: Indians may have been a model minority thirty years ago, when only the best Western-educated rich ones could make it through the filter. But not now. Gujurati and Punjabi hick shudras are just as awful as any unwesternized rural peasant can be and pretending that they're all Oxford-educated brahmins is a lie too big to swallow.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
25d ago
They could be, but you'd be surprised how many conspiracies and wrongdoings that occur and then unravel because someone couldn't be arsed to cover their bare asses in the wind. People who have power aren't always the ones who construct elaborate schemes to conceal themselves: sometimes, they're just dumbasses who put all of the incriminating evidence on a laptop and hand it over to a PC repair shop and don't even bother to pick it up because they just buy a new one.
Cough, cough.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
28d ago
My impression is that barring some sort of state of emergency or legislation regarding the matter, the federal government can't nationalize state national guardsmen over extended periods of time. But if the relevant individuals wish to volunteer to remain the feds can keep on paying them, so as long as the state consents to it. It was a sweet gig for one hundred and sixty people who got OT pay and expenses reimbursed in DC - right up until now.
Two National Guardsman shot in DC.
Situation is still developing... conflicting reports about deaths. Trump has already requested 500 more guardsmen to be deployed in the capital. I'm afraid that any commentary on my part will be pure speculation: I'll edit this OP as more information comes to light. Apologies for the shortness of this initial post.
I would expect ICE to be shot at, especially during active operations: but the National Guard? They're literally doing nothing but stand around. They're dads and uncles pulling overtime shifts away from their real jobs, not stormtroopers. I'm highly suspecting some sort of mental illness or dumb radicalization, but I'll refrain on coming to conclusions for now.
Edit 1: Suspect has been identified as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a Afghan national evacuated back in 2021.
Edit 2: Speculatively, a linkedin profile of the same name seems to point him as being connected to a bunch of American NGOs. I'm always skeptical of these - the world is big enough for strangers to have the same names - but the face on the profile seems to match the suspect.
Or perhaps I don't have an eye for Afghans, and they all look the same to me.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
29d ago
Because it's a non-argument: or rather, you're forgoing your opportunity to make an argument with an appeal to violence. Honestly, advocating others to fedpost on your behalf on social media is a cowardly and self-defeating act. A real chad just goes out and does things, you know?
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
1mo ago
For the first time in decades Christianity has the aesthetics of cool. Rather than try and stuff progressivism into the skinsuit of the Church, why not embrace it?
Sure, their faith is superficial, but I came into my faith for similarly superificial reasons. I wish to be strong, I wish to be valiant: I wish to be a knight in the service of God to slay dragons. That same motivation that converted the warrior pagans of the Franks, Germans and Visigoths is born again. Is that so wrong?
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
1mo ago
I don't like the gropyers. Nick Fuentes is a Mexican gayhomo larping as a whitenat.
But philosemeticism has clearly run its course in the West. The left discarded race blind meritocracy. Now, the right has too. You can't unring that bell. Saying "Jews have a disproportionate amount of influence in the halls of power compared to their population" can't be taboo if everyone is running around saying that about the whites. If Con. Inc demands its audience stop noticing, they'll be ignored. You can't be a nationalist for America and be a Zionist at the same time. You won't fool anyone.
Yes, that means you, Ben Shapiro.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
1mo ago
In the very first episode of Avatar we see the end stage of male disposability: a 13-year old boy trying to train six year olds to be fighters against an industrial war machine. Sokka is brave: insanely brave. He's the butt of the joke for a lot of the series but that first impression sticks with you. An entire fire nation dreadnought shows up on his shores and he puts on his war paint and boomerang and goes to fight them. But there's not a fight. He's not even worth the effort of killing.
That is very, very bleak.
The Southern Water Tribe doesn't have any men left, and he's fighting against wizards with magic powers who have industrial technology. Sokka and Aang fight because literally anyone else that could is either in a gulag or genocided: meanwhile, the Fire Nation girlbosses fight because it's a flex and they can afford wasting resources like that.
crushedoranges
Can Marx explain the used panties market?
1mo ago
Finlandization. It's a dirty word.
But it's the pragmatic equilibrium when you got a large land border with a belligerent neighbor.
Was it humiliating for the Finns to have to give up Karelia and the north? Yes.
But to hold on to those territories would have cost even more.
If the West isn't willing to intervene to return the oblasts and Crimea, then every day spent fighting now is a waste. Russia lacks the ability to threaten the entirety of its sovereignty, but has more than enough to hold on to what it has already gained. It's easy for politicians to spout rhetoric over not surrendering one inch of ground, but young men pay the price for that kind of talk. They're conscripting the 21-year olds now: how much of Ukraine's seed corn will be eaten?
If this war goes on long enough, you might as well start giving conscription papers to the elementary schools and maternity wards. The fighting has gone on for twelve years and there is still no political settlement. The land is important, yes. But the Ukrainian people are even more important. If there is to be a demographic future for the nation (for Russia, too!) peace sooner is better.
A hell of a lot of capital is being thrown into the AI space, so much so that it is disrupting the consumer computing market (much to my great annoyance and probably every PC gamer everywhere.) All of that growth into building datacenters and creating AI is a bubble: whether it will stabilize into consistent and regular growth like the Internet did or crash and burn remains to be seen.
More options
Context Copy link