In such case GDPR should not be a problem, right? Beyond cost of adding and having GDPR-specific incantations in the consent document.
I admit it is not ideal, but at least Google provides something that is often useful.
And as far as "to hell with marketers" this was the most likely one, deeper EU-wide partial outlawing of ad industry was not plausible.
But things like GDPR and the research ethics stuff (for human research) seem more influenced by safetyism and ass-covering to me.
I am not regulation fetishist unlike EU leadership but...
For GDPR for me "to hell with marketers and data leakers" is a convincing justification.
I was looking through some fines issued under GDPR and applaud them in general.
Well, what are some things even the most insightful men don’t get about female psychology and dating?
you need to target lower than "even the most insightful", this is a null set.
Buy in pharmacy? Supply for year costs less than 1h of work, there is no gain in getting cheaper one.
This is so common that it would be more interesting to me if someone called out a city where they've never seen such a thing.
Basically any city in Poland? You get some homeless but they are not aggressive. And most they smell, and you have trouble with that maybe once a year. In last 20 years the most aggressive were touts, when I was with foreign friends and speaking in English. Once I was slightly kicked by someone but that was some drunk woman and not homeless/drug bum.
(secret recipe is likely being poor so migrants will go elsewhere)
What should one do about it? I can vote for the most anti-crime candidate in every election (which I do), but they lose every time. If I live in a place like Seattle where 70% of the people are completely unwilling to address these problems, then I am effectively helpless.
move to less insane area?
United States overthrew their government
not USA
then they pressured them to be more and more militant towards Russia
I would say that Russia invading was stronger factor here
while arming them to the teeth
I wish, sadly it was not really done
after the invasion Boris Johnson scotched the potential peace deal
Somehow I doubt that Ukrainians were enthusiastic about Budapest Memorandum 2.0 no matter what Boris did.
And Russian proposals were bonkers and were effectively "can you dismantle your army so it will be easier to invade"?
then NATO law makers procrastinated for 9 months before sending any of significant armaments they promised
By April 2022 Poland send more than 200 tanks (240 from what I remember). And Mig-29 fighters (after doing it officially collapsed they were transferred as "spare parts", confidentially in large enough numbers to assemble some new planes). I could dig more for sources but 240 tanks counts as counterexample, you are not as well informed as you think on this topic.
This is a possibility, but people like that don't tend to be effete accountants whose most prominent vice is gambling. He self evidently didn't have the low inhibitions that type of person typically displays.
"don't tend to be" does not mean "cannot be" and people for various reasons blow up lives own and of others.
Is large illegal arms deal supposed to be better squaring with the rest of his life history?
It creates a large revanchist pressure group that will be spoiling to drag Poland into a war with Russia.
they are selected for "we run away from war", and for "fuck Russia" part there will be no to little disagreement
no idea why they would activate after Ukraine loses (and I guess that if they want they could go to East as partisans)
Which is true
nope, it is not
It is Russia who invaded because they could not accept not being a superpower anymore
alternative (helping Russia to be superpower or pretending it is) would be worse
Banderite groups throughout Europe in the late 2020s and early 2030s
what would be even motive, reasoning and strategy here?
Probably using leftover NATO weaponry.
Which one? Because it ranges from "utterly impractical in covert terrorism" and "they had it already" with side of "trying to do MH17 will end with partitioning your country if you are Ukraine, not Russia".
https://www.rp.pl/spoleczenstwo/art38269511-sondaz-wobec-uchodzcow-z-ukrainy-niechetne-sa-glownie-mlode-kobiety is a very quick example (I remember nice data analysis, cannot find it but effect clearly exists)
among polled - young woman rated in 48% as bad/very bad, 44% as good/very good.
In full population: 57% positive, 30% negative.
(before anyone compares it directly with other countries: Poles love to complain, what is visible also in positive/negative polls - while say Brazilians will give inflated positive answers)
where my understanding is women are more accepting of immigration than men.
And where it is typically men who who migrate and compete with men.
Do you have specific predictions in which way it will go wrong?
languages are pretty close to mutually intelligible
close to but not mutually intelligible
pretty much all women and children
And among Polish women (who are more likely to compete with new people) acceptance of Ukrainians is markedly lower
they’d assimilate pretty well
so far it goes relatively well
note that "some ethnic tensions" is from perspective of place that had none of them, where violence/racial/ethnic tension are far, far, far below USA ones and so on
Russia can just use conscripts to defend their own soil
we will see whether this will work out
so far it featured one of deadliest strikes in this war, with one of columns massacred
Poland welcomed $BIGNUM Ukrainians while having limited enthusiasm about other migrants and being poorer than Germany, Sweden and UK and therefore migrants themselves preferring to go elsewhere?
Note also border wall and illegal pushbacks of migrants imported by Łukaszenko and Putin (with illegality ignored by basically everyone, including EU).
Is anyone calling for cutting out sub-Saharan Africans or MENA migrants
EU is busy bribing countries in north Africa and Turkey so they will apply violence to keep migrants out.
"net positive" does not eliminate ethnic tensions, especially in country that used to be monolingual and monoethic.
For start, there are some people who lost on the changes or at least perceive themselves as losing or just hate that someone else benefitted more than them.
And there are some conflicts but more of "call with speaker enabled in train" rather than "create organised rape gang and blackmail police for years". Still, induces nonzero ethnic tensions what is noticeable when we used to have basically none.
For example https://konfederacja.pl/ (party on right, with most significant enti-EU, for free market, pro-Russia, anti-Ukraine, with bunch of clowns but has enough support to be elected) has constant anti-Ukrainian content, including attacking people in Poland.
What is pathetic is that the same people are praising this incursion as a good idea who have been trying to convince everyone for many months that the war will definitely be won in a short time
this sets are not the same
and in category "who can find more egregious bad takes" side that can use Russian MoD official statements is likely to win
and if anyone claims that this "war will definitely be won in a short time" then they should be ignored as stupid and/or propagandist
Nobody claimed IQ is single causal variable
Are you sure? Seems to me that https://www.themotte.org/post/1116/transnational-thursday-for-august-8-2024/239006?context=8#context did this
Having communism (IQ denying ideology) lowers your country prosperity for future decades.
"IQ denying ideology" not sure has this problem existed there at all, and it was not actual source of problems
and r-word accusations
"Are you new to this forum? DNA IQ." seems quite clear "racism is right", at least I see no real difference
Because the question is not factual. It's a "does this dress make me look fat" type of question. The good answer is what they want to hear.
nope
discussing how to tackle say corruption and overregulation can be interesting and fruitful discussion
rather than racist uninformed dismissal
Even if you tweak hard race definition to match current wealth of various areas it would completely fail how and why some areas got much richer within last decades (for example no matter how much you try you will NOT explain East Europe purely by "DNA IQ")
Note: it remains to be seen how Ukrainian migrants/refugees will work out long term in for example Poland. Now we are up a bit from "literally zero ethnic tensions", but still relatively low on overall scale.
And if one assumes an ugly grind, then it is better for it to take place in Russia. If fighting will involve artillery, glide bombs and drones turning towns and villages into ruins - then doing it on the other side of border seems preferable.
Even if partially true it would not be entire answer. And would be among harder to change so is not a good answer to this question anyway.
I am a finance professional as you guessed correctly. I make sure our markets stay functioning smoothly which has positive knock on effects elsewhere
No, it is more likely that you engage in parasitising on actually useful industries, do thinly veiled hazard or legally steal money.
Yes, some parts of financial sector are useful, but judging from your hutzpah I guess that you are engaging in Enron-type activities.
Coming from https://www.themotte.org/post/1118/a-call-to-be-more-american I like the irony.
(I wonder is vitamin D quality better in EU... Either way D is so cheap that adultering is less likely, I think)
More options
Context Copy link