cheesecake_llama
No bio...
User ID: 1354
There is nothing “pro constitutional” about attempting to abrogate birthright citizenship via executive order. Whether or not the administration’s interpretation of the 14th amendment—which strains the limits of legal credulity—is actually valid, the idea that the executive can just decide one day that clear Supreme Court precedent actually isn’t binding anymore because “I really don’t like it!” is monarchist, not republican.
I’m not asking if it’s a good idea as a matter of public policy. Just that, as a strictly economic matter, the states would be better off if they didn’t trade with each other according to your thesis.
Why are you in favor of free trade between states? Wouldn’t a state want to keep all the “value” inside its borders?
- Prev
- Next
You guys are whipped up in a frenzy over mere speculation. Is there any actual evidence to suggest corruption here? Trump constantly engages in brazenly corrupt behavior, but all I hear from the acolytes here are apologetics that strain the limits of credulity.
More options
Context Copy link