For one, injunctions in half the states against Biden's new title IX "misgendering is an expellable offense" rules. Which at least gave it a slim chance of being overturned by courts before it became a fait accompli.
The last item is a problem though. There is no recognized 2nd amendment right to murder drones, or even anti-murder-drone-drones or drone-jammers. That last will get you an FCC raid worse than any ATF dog-shoot competition.
If things take longer than a few more years to kick off, the 2nd amendment people will be using "bows and arrows against the lightning." The longer you wait the worse it gets, unless you happen to have a high tech weapons lab and global microelectronics manufacturing chain in your compound.
But the strange part is that many of the items in his list undermine the justifications for raised taxes, etc.
If academics and nonprofits don't have a presumption of moral status, how do we justify taking people's money to fund them and using their judgements to rule the people?
If education should be run purely as a service to students and parents, what moral argument is left against school choice?
If "politeness" rules aren't supposed to be a political weapon to stifle debate, how is his preference that "bad left wing ideas should gain power" at the expense of the truth going to be enforced?
It's all self-defeating, and so I suspect a totally performative offering of peace from a position of weakness, with his fingers firmly crossed behind his back.
One saving grace of the supreme court is the amazing advancements in life extension. By 2030 the Fede Gesserit Society will be analyzing the EBV longevity SNPs of high profile lawyers for the immortal scotus justice breeding program.
I'm still expecting to wake up to headlines about "election night miracle as millions of WW1 veterans surge to polls in key swing states: they fought to protect trans kids from Hitler, now they're back to save america from fascism"
I'm following Ken White and some other usual suspects on bluesky. If she does lose they're already prepping that narrative hard. Lots of "the votes of racist misogynists aren't valid expressions of democracy"
Is there a reason, or just enthusiasm? Were the Dems considered more likely to increase taxes and regulation on crypto?
They made out incredibly well for themselves in all the panic spending though. Nobody's ever made a full account of all the trillions that ended up going to left wing orgs. I'm sure that more than made up for general economic damage.
Very saturated now though. Becoming a fresh right wing Twitter personality puts you up against some very stiff competition. Sadly even the constant struggle to stay on top has burned out a lot of good men: 0HPLovecraft is about to hit -10
I'm more interested in what was with the people trying to convince everyone who doubted it that they were crazy. There was a real hard consensus building push there, almost as forced as "weird" was.
Didn't one of those leftist media assassination groups literally hire a group of people to listen to every Joe Rogan episode to find things they could use to get him kicked off Spotify? I definitely remember that being organized within a few days of him getting the deal, as the pressure groups collaborated with traitors in the company.
Sorely wishing I could join the riots just to score a truck load of free plywood, but I bet it's all quarter inch, and half of it looks like fucking osb.
This is exactly what I meant in my prediction post last night. He's already got everyone playing defense trying to prove reality is real to his satisfaction.
Wait, you're telling me Cadence Owens is with the Schizocore Hyperboria video crowd now?
Seems like the big positive is getting dad active again, right? Depending on how he's feeling about the whole thing that might outweigh everything else.
None from the looks of it, but what's the actual ballot return rate? A few of these guys might put down the bong and go find their ballots in the mail pile, or actually go to the polls on their lunch break.
if Republicans want the answers faster they could allow PA to start counting votes earlier
But you're also defending accepting new ballots days after the election anyway, so that's not a real argument for getting it done faster. It's so transparent.
Yeah. You don't get weird new policies added for dog-bites-man stories, even when it might be a good idea. But you get a horngry weasel down your pants one time and suddenly you're in an OSHA brief.
I wouldn't be so sure. Aren't a lot of his viewers low propensity young men who are extremely unlikely to have already done anything to vote early? It might be timed to get them out on election day itself.
I suspect they're expecting riots no matter who wins. They're organized and funded in advance, and you can't tell the people you've bussed in to shut up and go home without blowing off some steam. Like Hines always talks about, blues just consider it a charming youthful game for their tribe, like Spartan kids playing Pillage The Helots.
If Harris wins the riot can be about Dunkin Donuts' complicity with Israel or something.
I read the labels of coconut and almond "milk" recently, and realized they're literally just flavored carb-water. At least soy milk has a bit of protein in it.
Looks like I was mixing it up with something else, thank you.
I have terrible news for you about the board members of Euthanasia Trough Ltd
In case you didn't mistype that, please please please don't tell me how an animal sanctuary makes money on onlyfans.
No, it just delays the inevitable by a few years, until they get in again and finish the plan of giving their imported migrants the vote in every swing state.
Go look at Ken White doing the "literally murder heritage foundation members" thing and tell me there's any option other than getting the necessary violence over with as fast and effectively as possible. Bluesky is already talking about a final solution to the white man problem, why should we give them any more time to prepare for it, when they will only grow stronger and their brainwashing more effective?
If you say why not bomb them tomorrow, I say why not today. If you say ok sure, I say why not 40 years ago when this could have been stopped by a targeted excision instead of civilization-destroying war?
More options
Context Copy link