SkoomaDentist
No bio...
User ID: 84
Known better as just the messages tab om facebook. Which a lot of people my age use. Also works seamlessly on laptop & tablets unlike sms or whatsapp.
But really the #1 killer feature of FB messages is that they’re tied to your name, not to your arbitrary phone number. Want to send someone a message? Just send one. No need to try to hunt their phone number.
Why use any social media aside from linkedin and a facebook/whatsapp account for messaging?
Conversely, I've never understood people who ragequit Facebook completely and then try to demand others to use some niche service to contact them. Just stop reading the feed (install a browser extension if you have to) but keep the messenger.
One of the reasons given is that X's new terms of service kick in today.
What's the difference to old? What do they mean in practise?
A while ago I came to the conclusion that any intellectual (or ”intellectual”) commonly being discussed here is a sign that their main skill is filling pages and pages with nonsense and that I should simply completely ignore anything that intellectual says. It works remarkably well.
It looks like this classic low budget Finnish comedy skit from the 90s was really more of a documentary.
Does Trump even care about trans people as long as they (or more likely their allies) don't make a huge amount of noise?
AI is still limited to text boxes and text manipulation or content generation
What? Of course it isn't.
AI is used all the time in a whole bunch of "invisible" applications that have nothing to do with text or content generation. Take a photo with a phone camera? You're using AI. Use Nvidia RTX voice? AI. Deal with pharmaceutical molecule research? Fair chance of AI being used. Play guitar and use the newest generation of amp modelers? That's AI again.
Of course. I'd estimate that using synthetic data results in an overall worse performing AI but I could see it being used to fill specific gaps in the real training material (probably using a specialized model that's good at that specific type of data and possibly not much else).
It’s interesting that the bottleneck is given as lack of data rather than architecture.
It's not lack of data as such (there's gobs and gobs of raw data). It's curated high quality data of a suitable form and that can actually be used (be that for legal or technical reasons). The reason synthetic data is used because it solves (or claims to solve) the curation and form issues. The trainers can directly instruct the source AI to provide data of type X in quantity Y.
I legitimately can't tell if it's real or not.
It's easy to tell it's not AI: It's coherent over a very long time which is beyond what video AIs are capable of currently.
I've been really thinking about how gendered this election is. I use Instagram. If I could turn off every woman in my feed for the next week and the past one, I would take that option in a heartbeat.
This applies even (or especially) outside US. I expect to see much social media wailing from some of the women I know while the few men to comment anything are likely to be about what Trump's win means for European defence and economy.
What's ACB?
Another relevant fact is that the problem is self solving with time at any height where there is meaningful atmospheric drag because any debris would need further boosting to stay up.
Surely expecting to read the first paragraph of an article isn’t too much…
Q: How do you recognize a second generation Polish or Ukrainian immigrant?
A: They have a funny (sur)name.
At least that's how it works in Finland.
This was notably the case in the Winter War in 1939 when Finland was so poorly resourced that many soldiers couldn't be equipped with proper uniforms. They used their own clothes and were only provided with a belt and a hat with the official emblem sewn on.
even if you have a slow computer, as long as it is Turing-Complete
Here's the thing, though. No real world computer is Turing-complete. They all have finite storage and thus fail the infinite tape requirement. For an obvious example, try running eg. Stable Diffusion on an early 90s PC - you simply can't because they don't have enough storage for the model and results, even if you allowed infinite time.
Man, I miss TPO…
I doubt that'll work since it's essentially same as EMPing your own positions given that drones are offensive, not defensive forces. If you had enough space between for your own units and positions being affected over a very large area, you wouldn't be having a drone problem in the first place.
Lightroom / Photoshop or a bunch of other similar programs. Pretty much every major image editing app has added or is racing to add AI features because they are so useful. Some sort of decent AI denoise is nowadays expected even from free apps.
Here's an example from non-LLM (because LLM are massively overemphasized here): Fixing a noisy photo I took after the sunset against the sky.
First thing is using AI Denoise to massively reduce the visible noise due to the lighting conditions.
Second is using AI sky detection to make a one-click accurate mask of the sky so I can easily even out the brightness between the ground and the sky.
Final step is using content aware remove (aka generative neural network) to remove distracting tree branches with near-perfect results.
You could have sort of done the same four years ago, but it would have resulted in blurry details (from old school stupid denoise) and taken an order of magnitude more manual work. With AI tools it's just pointing at the thing and telling the app to "Just Do It".
If by effective low pass filter you mean a filter that makes me ctrl-w almost immediately, you're right. Such posts are the ratsphere textual equivalent of youtube videos where you have to watch half an hour of video to get two minutes of actual information.
One thing unusual about our neighborhood is that it sits in the local bubble of unusually deep vacuum, which makes astronomy easier. And on a larger scale there's the local void where there's unusually few galaxies nearby.
On the other hand, we're blocked from what'd be probably the most fascinating view by interstellar dust clouds between us and the galactic core. We win some, we lose some.
I just wish some astronomy apps had a simulation of "This is what we'd see if there weren't those damned clouds in between".
I've always thought that a lot of rat adjacent people cannot really differentiate between actually good posts and posts that are just overly long, Scott being a notable example of that group.
- Prev
- Next
You can use it via the mobile website, too.
More options
Context Copy link