@Quantumfreakonomics's banner p

Quantumfreakonomics


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 00:54:12 UTC

				

User ID: 324

Quantumfreakonomics


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 00:54:12 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 324

It is amusing to me that the only crime considered worthy of death is being on the wrong end of a current thing murder. Things aren’t looking good for our boy Luigi.

Oooh, I think your right. The timeline matches up with the passage of the ADA (which requires extra time on exams for disabilities, among other things).

Owning stock in the company that builds AGI is one of the best ways to increase your probability of being in the 10%!

Fun fact: This is isomorphic to Roko's Basilisk.

For the last few years I have thought that for sure other companies would be able to knock-off their market share. This opinion has cost me thousands of dollars.

preferably through broadly diversified, cost-efficient vehicles.

I don't know. To quote OpenAI, "it may be difficult to know what role money will play in a post-AGI world." While almost all stockholder distributions are currently paid in cash, in-kind distributions are not unknown, and could potentially become the primary benefit of holding AI-exposed companies. If Microsoft gives stockholders access to the OFFICIAL OPENAI EXPERIENCE MACHINE, you might not get access simply from holding SPY, QQQ, or VTI. Hell, you might want to direct-register your shares to prevent any beneficial ownership shenanegans.

The key element in IV that makes it work is how smooth industrialization feels. There’s not just two or three key techs that unlock massive growth. Almost every single advance between printing press and electricity gives a tiny productivity advantage too small to notice individually, but each one compounds all of the others. Nothing before or since has quite matched it in terms of aesthetics of play.

Why would they? If they leave it vague, "we are conducting tests of classified defense technology over civilian airspace," that would make everyone freak out more. If they say specifically what they're testing, that compromises our counterintelligence efforts.

90% chance this is some classified US government project. The feds didn’t officially acknowledge Area 51 for decades after it was obvious they had a test base there. This is just how they roll.

but I know the infection control nurse is the person who goes around cancelling all of our tests that will show that the patient got a hospital acquired infection" (through nobody's fault) because the government doesn't like when we have those.

First thought: How is this a thing?

Second thought: Oh yeah, economics. Of course this is a thing.

Third thought: Can we shoot these people instead?

Fourth thought: It totally was somebody’s fault. I realize that meticulous clinical hygiene is hard. People will still die if you screw it up.

I think they’re about $1000.

I'm actually not so sure about that. CEOs are, no offense, more important than regular people. This is true descriptively if not normatively. If CEOs stop maximizing shareholder value because they have concerns for their physical safety, that could have sizable effects on the economy.

In recent years, it really did seem like the media put in the effort to not glorify mass shooters by plastering their image all over the place, fueling speculation as to their motives, and generally making them look cool. There are major shooting incidents to which I don't even remember the perpetrator's name. It finally sank in that this kind of attention was counterproductive.

Which is why I am fascinated by the Luigi Mangione story. He cracked the code. News outlets are showing his face 24-7. Everyone is talking about the issues that he wants us to be talking about. This guy is the most famous, most popular, and, if the ladies are to be believed, sexiest criminal of the 21st century. Why? Basic competence at not being immediately apprehended? Selecting an unpopular target? Being attractive? Not being unattractive?

The mood on social media feels like the end of Joker. Full mask-off glorification of murder, but it's gleeful -- giddy even. Part of the thrill of voting for Trump was the idea that the people, through sheer collective desire, could will one person out of prison, to look at someone prosecuted by the justice system and say, "no, we have his back". Can it be any surprise that the left wants in on this intoxicating elixir?

Really though, why would the account be taken down? It breaks no rules. He wasn’t using it to spread his manifesto. It’s just reflexive that online platforms take down the accounts of shooters. Good on Elon for having the guts to leave it up.

Was he popular with the ladies already, or was it literally the murder that did it?

Date: 2021-10-05 14:08:46 GMT

Body: five years ago it felt like a really serious conflict in my mind that what was maximally good often seemed weird, or sketchy, or tacky, or unpleasant, or just plain aesthetically distasteful

these days it feels like the good is shockingly aligned with the fun, the beautiful, the awesome, the exciting, the sexy and shiny and cool

… I … don’t know what to think or how to feel about that tbh

I had forgotten about this one. This is some Shakespeare-level forshadowing. Such a tragic figure.

I saw his modern architecture rant and immediately knew that he reads Scott

It wasn’t quite the psyche-shaking revelation that reading Caroline Ellison’s Tumblr was, but he certainly seems more relatable than I was expecting.

It is a very important job. Somebody has to tell doctors and patients no. That said, I sure wouldn’t want to do it.

I think it is hypothetically possible for a health insurance CEO to be so cartoonishly evil that murdering him on the street becomes ethically justified. I haven’t seen the evidence yet. I assume if it existed it would be plastered all over the internet.

I had the thought that maybe the US should back Assad militarily in exchange for kicking out Russia and Iran and recognizing Israel. Who says no to that arrangement?

So like, what happens to Syria once Assad is gone?

Romanian Supreme Court Cancels Election, Overthrows Results of First Round

Recently, unknown dark horse anti-NATO candidate Călin Georgescu shocked the world by winning a plurality of the vote in the first round of Romania's presidential election. Key to his victory was an intense social media campaign, with a particular emphasis on Tik-Tok.

Romania's Supereme Court has today declared these results null and void. The full opinion setting out their reasoning has yet to be published, but this is almost certainly due to allegations of Russian interference. I have not seen any credible accusations that votes themselves were fraudulently cast, only that Georgescu's campaign recieved improper (illegal?) assistance from Russian media operations. This is IMO the most important outstanding question.

At least hospital administrators pay attention to how much things cost.

In many cases, doctors literally do not know how much the treatments they provide cost. This means that they simply don’t do any cost-benefit analysis. They will prescribe an expensive brand-name drug instead of a generic drug that does basically the same thing for no reason other than because they heard about it more recently.

SBF made a mockery of the financial system. That is a bigger offense against the United States and civilized society than all but the worst gangbangers.

I don’t think the crime needs to be charged to be pardoned, but I do think it needs to be specified. Look at the text of the constitution, it refers to the pardoning of offenses, not the pardoning of persons. You should have to specify the offense.

I saw this about an hour ago. Then just now I see that the stock is up over 1% since the shooting (other health insurance stocks are level or lower, so this isn’t some broader-market phenomenon).

Did he suck as a CEO? Imagine being the guy’s wife rn.