@Pynewacket's banner p

Pynewacket


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 00:45:21 UTC

				

User ID: 315

Pynewacket


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 00:45:21 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 315

Are you of the opinion that children are just as capable of mental analysis as Adults but just in a small form factor?

Agency should be maximized insofar as it does not contradict possibility and sustainability.

Limits on the possible and sustainable should be attacked aggressively insofar as technological and social progress can eliminate them.

But if the result of this is the possible sterilization of the subject, and we consider that we are in population decline with a bellow replacement level Reproductive rate, how is that in any way, shape or form sustainable?

Let's not forget too the minority grooming/rape Gangs that were abetted for years too. No child is sacred, only the ideology.

Removing rights of parents in raising their children is going against mammalian nature, like forbidding pair-bonding...

well, we are well on our way to make pair bonding as mythical as the American Dream is right now. They (The Progressive Front) are consistent, I will give them that.

I'm of the opinion that before a far left total victory, what it will be is the population bomb we have been sitting in for years is finally going to go off and the chaos and ruin initialized by the collapse of the SS scheme will be enough to begin forcing more far right policies.

Politically governments around the world are already addicted to using Big Tech to manipulate their citizens, why would they give it up when something even more powerful comes along?

oh no, I agree with you, but as they say in 4chan, it's a skill issue: those that wish the convenience and walled garden will go with the Corpo AI and get all the propaganda and those that wish for a more free experience will go with the local option, more rudimentary but at the end of the day not so different from the core experience.

What about safe spaces, does that count?, and then we have Affirmative action, segregated graduation ceremonies.

ah fuck, I think I just found my soulmate.

you think that is obnoxious, try the big name drop list in any office program title bar. I f one of those opens windowed and you want to maximize it you better press the single maximize button otherwise you risk just changing names midsession.

instead of nosediving it looks more like the polarity was just inverted.

guys, just remember that local models exists. As consumer electronics improve those will too. Sure they won't be as capable as the corpo ones, but they don't need to be state of the art for the majority of things we want from them.

It may be useful to standarize your prompt so that things like grading, grading criteria and scope of the questions are the same across multiple sessions. That will help you detect inconsistencies and mistakes more easily.

If they supported it is besides the point. It would only modify my statement to include 2 traitors instead of just one.

even worse, when he signed the bump stock ban he actively went against his base.

sounds like it is doing its job. I would give them a rise instead if that is the case.

OP is going to find it the hard way when his boss interviews him with his manifest in hand, as I'm sure the party responsible for brainwashing his relative isn't going to take kindly to interlopers.

This leaves me in a bind, because I still feel myself a liberal in my bones, and female equality is a natural and inevitable derived principle of liberalism.

Every time that impulse rears its ugly head in my heart I beat it bloody by remembering Ukraine and the draft, and concluding that enfranchisement should be only for those expected to die for it.

AI Rick: hmmm, I don't know. Best I can offer you is a few seconds of contemplation in Human Remembrance day.

He used savescumming and various exploitative tactics to abuse the AI and game mechanics. He treated every day in-game like it was a turn in a strategy game, maximizing his outcomes. Who is to say that there aren't weird and grossly tryhard ways to cheat our systems or physics? Banks occasionally make random errors of the 'unlimited overdraft for your account' type - maybe there are ways to mess with their website or spoof their AI in very contrived circumstances. There are backdoors into nearly all modern processors courtesy of US security forces, plus some more backdoors due to human error. If you're smart in crypto, you can siphon millions of dollars worth of funds out of a protocol. If you have social skills and balls, you can social-engineer your way into 'protected' computer systems via password recovery. What if you can do all those things and have decades of subjective time to plot and multitask, while we only have days or weeks to react?

And GPT-4 strategy for evading CAPTCHAs is subcontracting to human hustlers. And what would it do if asked why a captcha, lie of course. GPT-5 or GPT-6 will murder and I won't even be surprised.

Do you see a divorce in your future?

Man courts woman with low self esteem. Man has severe character flaw or skeletons in closet. Man fixes woman's self esteem, woman fixes man.

Don't forget the: Woman is presented as ugly or non-atractive at the begining but with a plucking of eyebrows and a wardrobe change everyone else finds out she is beautiful. And first sexual encounter between the love interests being nonRape.

This is the central "conflict" of the story: the Ringers believe that humanity has to leave Earth or die. Judy and her eco-coops insist they're actually fixing their world (yes, the whole book is literally a Tikkun Olam meme), but the Ringers claim that Earth is already doomed.

So the aliens are just Char Aznable/Hathaway Noa, at least the author could have added gundams to make it mildly interesting.

It's not the mods' duty (or really, any other user in this site) to do the job for you. If you can present an effort post as a top level comment, present it; if you can't, then refrain from posting as Amadan said "very low-effort and trollish" posts.

that is fair, thanks.

Recognizing the moral superiority of the slave and his fight for freedom versus the moral inferiority of the slaveowner who fights to own human beings as livestock is not repugnant to any neutral observer.

And then you open a history book and realize that slavery wasn't an exclusive white institution and that one of it's MANY points of origins were african kingdoms.