@Listening's banner p

Listening


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2025 March 03 23:26:52 UTC

				

User ID: 3572

Listening


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2025 March 03 23:26:52 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 3572

I think feminists use the word "woman" instead of "female" to somewhat soften their policy positions.

Feminists use the word "women" because "females" makes you sound like you've watched too many Star Trek episodes.

And saying that "males are trash" would be a lot more obviously hateful than "men are trash"

"Reverse-sexism is as much a contradiction in terms as reverse-racism."

I primarily care about how this issue affects that demographic.

Might want to consider how alienating half your friends and then starting a war with JK Rowling affects that demographic.

"The second coming of Gamergate—this time with more media support!" isn't actually a long-term sustainable (survivable?) position.

It’s a position of inconsistency.

"Hardcore fiscal conservatism deeply unserious" looks fairly consistent to me. Maybe they've just lost control of the party and nobody cares.

America's reaction to 9/11 may be currently crashing the country into a giant wall...

We've just spent a little under two decades chanting "jews are white! jews are white! jews are white!" while also establishing that anyone can call anyone "Nazi" for any reason they feel like. "RETVRN" becomes harder with every passing day.

(Actually doing something about that might be advisable at this point.) (Further validating "racism is right-wing so we can't be anti-Semitic by definition" would be a very bad "something.") (Hint: there are secular people here. Who used to be friends.)

Doesn't seem to be much pro-tariff writing visible at the moment, presumably because the usual suspects hate Trump more than they love accusing "free trade" of being the libertarian equivalent of crystalline Lisp pyramids.

Here are a few pieces I found lying around:
Michael Pettis, Foreign Affairs
Matt Stoller, newsletter

Not necessarily endorsed. Though I don't necessarily regard global efficiency as desirable when it's under somebody else's control, long run.

Would take a massive culture shift. Default response in tech industry spaces to "we need a defense industry" is "die fascist, you don't belong in this world!" Those guys almost never get moderated either. Kids grow up reading this stuff everywhere and take it for social truth.

The appropriate response to "people like you" is talking about "you" (collective). Not shutting up on that one.

Retracted pending choir invisible.

On a practical level I think that sort of thinking is gone from almost all modern education

This seems more like an argument for the dissolution of the monasteries than a defense.

And while the impacts of not noticing from medicine are higher, I'm not sure we should be held to a higher standard than anyone else

Of course not—the sea pouring in certainly won't be confined to just medicine.

"The mental state of people in medicine isn't related to whether they were warned about what they were normalizing."

I really don't think that is true.

You really don't think it's true that people were warned? That's really not a question of mental state.

I hope you understand why people like me hold people like you responsible for the economic devastation of Trump's tariffs.

I sincerely doubt your capacity to hold anyone responsible for anything. Too many essays about the merits of complicity and sitting quietly.

No, most people were fooled just as much as anyone else was.

They were warned. Repeatedly. Not quietly. Not by conservatives.

How do we get the trust back?

You don't? I'm pretty sure the correct answer is "make like the police and get defunded." Or get subject to a constant background level of social opprobrium for the rest of your life. Same difference.

Everybody knew what they were getting into when they kicked this off. They just thought it was worth the risk.

This certainly can be a problem if you apply for a professorship, but not on the levels below that.

Unfortunately academia in the US is pretty precarious below tenure level. And despite nominally opposing that state of affairs, the "progressive" crowd have always been happy to settle intraparty scores permanently.

It was safer to go somewhere entirely else than to be always almost (not quite) a friend. That "ally" just means "enemy" with extra steps.

I have it on very good authority that I'm conservative, and I would probably be a physicist or an archivist in a world where that were really on offer. I used to think I was progressive. For me, university and after was a process of learning that wasn't the case. So here we are.

It looks a little late to go back from where I'm standing—but who knows? You changed my mind once. Maybe you'll manage it twice in one life.

Crystal Cafe is 4chan but with (more) women who like saying "moid" a lot. Clarity?

British Empire in a funny hat? Never seen 'em.

Aesthetic but not factual agreement. Pity about the synthesis.

(I think a lot of wiser heads got scared off by career-incompatible drama way back when. Organization is certainly a better way to deal with the suicidally incompetent.)

Surely. Which bit, exactly?

Speaking as a current atheist, "Progressives are anti-Christian?" is a profoundly implausible statement. The difference between left- and right-wing atheists is that the latter also dislike everything else.

Though I've never been attracted to performative crucifix dunking or global-warming paint throwing. If that's the best you can do, you aren't capable of building any world I want you to live in.

Sorry, that was insensitive. How much Crystal Cafe are you on?

Context, my dear roadhouse, context.

Moon atheist waifu supremacy

Every time you post something like this...

How many layers of 4chan are you on, anyway?

https://xcancel.com/1RSH4D_x/status/1884447166959345691

Would it really be any tragedy at all? So many better uses for the material...

  • -28