@JTarrou's banner p

JTarrou


				

				

				
11 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 22:02:51 UTC

11B2O


				

User ID: 196

JTarrou


				
				
				

				
11 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 22:02:51 UTC

					

11B2O


					

User ID: 196

Just before Covid, a gun store was robbed in my town. I worked in a different gun store, so we got some of the inside scoop. Proprietor of the robbed store used to work on my computer whenever I fucked it up too badly. The shop was the shittiest one in the county, lodged in a former meat market. The robbers just pulled part of the roof off the building to get into the secure room.

Turned out to be the local high school football team. They stole around fifty guns, fifteen of which have been recovered some seven years later. The recovered guns have been used in at least three homicides so far. One was just recovered at a traffic stop this year, one killed a high school senior just after prom not two weeks ago. Perp there hasn't been identified or caught.

The kids who robbed the place were caught within days. It remains unclear exactly how many people were involved, at least two unnamed juveniles were processed, but shield laws prevent the public knowing anything. Three of the older kids were charged for the robbery, one got no time, other two got three and ten months respectively, despite not cooperating with police in the recovery of the firearms or identification of other perpetrators. Everyone involved was put into a youth criminal diversion program that released them without a criminal record.

The ringleader and one who got the most time, one Travontis Miller, was given the ten month sentence, but due to the protective nature of the diversion program, it will never be public knowledge that he plead guilty to multiple firearm felonies or how long he actually served of that jail term. What we do know is that he was out prior to December of 2021, because that's when he was arrested for a series of other crimes we're not entirely sure what happened.

He was charged with assault and battery (strangulation), robbery and domestic violence, but once again was given protected youth status despite being in his twenties by this point (the program runs until age 24). He also picked up charges of resisting arrest and being in possession of one of the stolen firearms from the original gun store case. These charges too were concealed under the diversion program.

So when people tell me that what we really need to cut down on gun violence in this country is to ensure that every state has a different magazine limit, or force used gun sales into stores, or ban AR-15s, or not allow gun companies to advertise, it makes me irrationally angry. This dude, when he hits 25, will have no criminal record and will be able to pass a background check to buy a firearm legally. At least until his next felony, which I don't expect to take long.

Below are two quote sets for those who didn't read the articles, first the prosecution in the original case:

At the June sentencing, Stevenson objected to Borrello’s indication that he would grant the defendants HYTA status.

“In this case, the defendants stole 50 guns from Showtime Guns,” Stevenson said. “Fifty guns. Only 14 of those firearms have been recovered as of April 8 of this year. And no surprise, Judge, all of them have been found in the hands of convicted felons. In fact, one of those firearms was used in a homicide in December in which an 87-year-old grandmother was shot in the face and killed.”

The judge wasn't interested, and had The Science on his side.

"It’s very clear science, evidence-based conclusions that the brain isn’t fully developed in young men until roughly around the age of the mid 20s,” Borrello said. “These gentlemen allegedly committed these crimes when they were teenagers, not even adults. If I learned one thing in handling juvenile lifers, it’s that we have to look at these things a little bit differently than we look at adults making the same poor decisions that these gentlemen may have made.”

But sure, the problem with gun violence in the US is that Billy Bob put a giggle trigger on his PSA.

Standards are as standards function. If whatever outlet you dislike routinely reports details of incidents that your media silo doesn't, it may behoove you to pay attention, or find something else to fill that information gap. You can usually do this via X, some of these racists are remarkably precise.

Which is why your survey of the media was faulty.

1: We're talking about juries here, not retail

2: No, your outfit isn't "fun".

3: Men are afraid to do what? Wear pink? My knee supports for BJJ are pink, cancer thing for one of our people. Choking a sweaty dude in spandex, now that's fun.

Yeah, there's no way of getting reliable information anymore, so it's all going to be seen in retrospect.

And you figure you can hang your hat on his word? You have more faith in the man than I do.

The stated reason by who exactly?

Maybe, or maybe because the negotiations have an end in sight and the battlefield doesn't. Hard to say, we know nothing of the diplomacy and due to misinformation, less than nothing about the military state of things.

How badly has it gone? The US has decimated their leadership, owns their skies, is blockading their sea access, taken single-digit casualties and the best they can do is raise insurance rates on shipping and the price of oil a dollar a gallon. I don't know your background in military history, but that is not traditionally the sort of outcome seen as a loss.

At the same time, there has been a major realignment of the Sunni nations against Iran and toward rapprochement with Israel and the US. This has been partially long in the works, partially due to Trump's specific policies, and partly due to Iran bombing everyone in the middle east in their hissy fit over not being able to do shit against the US air force. Even if the Iran campaign isn't decisive, this realignment might be the biggest setback Iran has experienced in their modern foreign policy. The Shia crescent is broken. And somehow, people keep telling me how badly Trump is doing. Enlighten me!

After two weeks of getting passed over, you may be right. Can you believe these scrubs don't want the venerable JTarrou to judge their cases? I bet they're intimidated by my intellect!

For me, within the first half hour maybe. The conversation felt like the sort of thing I wouldn't mind doing for a long time. Knew pretty quickly I wanted to try for a relationship, see how it went. Second date I told her I wanted a relationship, within a couple months I told her I wanted the relationship to be indefinite. That's when she let me know about her infertility. Great for me, but could have easily been unacceptable.

Broadly, I'd say my gut was pretty correct pretty quickly. Certainly the first night I met her, before we ever went on a date. Wasn't so much "amg soulmates" as "I can work with this".

No mention of this?

Seems like Putin floating the trial balloon for negotiated settlement to me.

Once again, your entire theory is based on a lot of wild assumptions using as evidence things you can't possibly know (i.e. how long the Iran war was "planned", which is not in any way how military operations planning works.) You assume that Trump is incompetent because you think the timeline was different to what has happened, which you know because of your seat on the National Security Council, presumably? Assuming Trump wasn't lying that time? Assuming whatever you based this on was reported accurately and without bias, as any article about Trump always is?

I mean, it's silly but hard to get worked up over. Women are always trying to bully men into emasculating themselves, if you've reached adulthood without the ability to resist that.......I got nothin for you. This is kindergarten stuff.

If anyone is confused or autistic, try a warm smile and the word "no". It's the most beautiful word in the language. Let it roll off your tongue. Let it flow through you. "No". Do not explain. Do not apologize. Do not elaborate. Never adorn your "no" with anything further. Say it cheerfully, as if someone offered you a drink you don't like. "No". You aren't in school anymore. You are an adult, a free person. Tell them no. Choose, and communicate.

Don't whine that you didn't have the intestinal fortitude to resist the social pressure of a middle-aged woman. And certainly don't whine that culture and the government didn't tell you it was ok to resist the social pressure of a middle-aged woman. You don't need them, you've got me. Tell them no. It really is just that easy!

edit: By hilarious happenstance, I'm on jury duty this week, haven't been picked yet. We'll see how it goes, but I guaranfuckentee I won't be in a costume by the end.

I left plenty of space in that napkin math to account. I stand by my wild-ass-guess.

If this is so detrimental to Europe and obviously incompetent, why is Kier Starmer easing the same sanctions?

The defunct Tories pounce:

The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, posted on X: “After 18 months of ‘standing up to Putin’ the Labour govt quietly issued a licence allowing imports of Russian oil refined in third countries.

“Yesterday Labour MPs voted against UK oil and gas licences. We are now importing from Russia instead of drilling in the North Sea. Insane.”

My experience is that most girls have a very horny section of the dating cycle, that often exceeds the male at that particular time. This in no way means women are hornier than men on average and over time.

Most people call it the "honeymoon period" or whatever. For me, it generally started about a month into the relationship and lasted six to nine months. If you stay together, this usually dies down pretty quickly and pretty drastically. Or you can break up and start over, trying again and again to experience that new-relationship feeling.

If you've had multiple 2+ year relationships in which the women were still hornier than you at the end, I'd guess you have a lower-than-average male sex drive, or you have the special Sex Panther pheromones.

just being not fat or actively ugly gets you to a 4 in a lot of markets as a woman.

Roughly two thirds of women 18-35 are overweight. Just being not fat gets you to at least a five, probably a six. A non-fat, non-ugly girl in that age range is in the top 25% of available women.

I'll grant you every single one of those, triple the results, double that just for fun and 40 year olds are still not as horny as teenagers. Anyone telling you that is lying and you need to be asking yourself why. You also need to be asking yourself why you would want to believe something so obviously and provably false? What sort of mental hill is that getting you over? What benefit could it possibly be to anyone to delude themselves about such basic natural phenomena?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/doj-eliminates-obama-era-slush-200100938.html

The practice of directing funds to nonprofits with a mission somehow related to the harm done by the accused was adopted under the Obama administration. The practice resulted in millions of dollars being funneled to social service agencies and advocacy groups especially when it came to settlements with large financial institutions.

That's some bizarre logic based on a lot of very shaky assumptions. But it probably helps to start with the theory......

So absolutely anything that adjusts the price of oil is proof positive of Russian stoogery?

That should be a long list!

We don't get that option, we only get Trump or the Democrats.

If corruption bothers you, politics is going to be a rough hobby.

You could say "more brazen", or you could say "more honest".

Trump has been saying this openly from the beginning, how he legally bribed all the right people because that's how the world works. His schtick has always been "I'm a member of the corrupt elite, but on your side, as proven by the hatred of your opponents".

Much of the horror at his various schemes and policies has been the breaking of kayfabe, which of course is always part of kayfabe. No, Europe, you don't have an independent foreign policy, now pay your dues and be good client states. Yes, we will fuck over our enemies and replace their governments if we can. Yes, we do want their oil. No, you can't legalize discrimination against the majority of the country in the name of anti-discrimination. It breaks all the social norms and self-delusions of the ruling elite.

My logic is that the Dems are funding their political activism with taxpayer money, and have been for a very long time. This has been entirely uncontroversial to you personally. It is ridiculous to expect that the other party will hold to their "principles" and let them have a structural advantage permanently. Eventually, they will find someone who will exploit all the loopholes their opponents have been. Like Trump.

I can summarize all TDS with the childhood lament "Mommy he hit me back!".