@HaroldWilson's banner p

HaroldWilson


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 October 03 21:22:34 UTC

				

User ID: 1469

HaroldWilson


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 October 03 21:22:34 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1469

What's the alternative to changing the basket of goods as consumer's change their behaviour. Or should we still have a Marconi Wireless and pipe tobacco in the basket?

The unemployment thing doesn't matter as long as you compare like with like. The various unemployment numbers tend to track each other very closely.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1aPBr

It is almost literally impossible these days to find a vehicle with <100k miles for <$10k

I would hardly deny that buying cars is more expensive now that several years ago, but the increase has been nothing like on the scale you're implying. Again, numbers are your friend. Since Biden took office average used car prices have gone up somewhere around 25%. That's bad, not even close to the over 2x increase you are suggesting.

And if you to any online second hand car website you can find stacks upon stacks of car with under 100k miles for well under 10k.

Edit: wrong link, correct one here https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUSR0000SETA02

could we interpret rising debt as sign of a pending recession/correction?

I wouldn't say so, but either way this is irrelevant, because it's a completely different question to whether the economy is 'good' or not. Unless you think people (i.e. Republicans) are rating the economy as poor because they've looked at the FRED charts and decided we're headed for another 2008.

Look at it this way. Even retrospectively, most people would describe the early 2000s as good economic times, no?

What are family formation rates looking like? Education costs and student debt? Property/housing costs? Food quality/price shifts?

Why would we use other statistics which are not the thing we are trying to measure to get an approximation of something we can, in fact, measure? To paraphrase Sir Humphrey, why are your family formation statistics facts but my real wage facts merely statistics?

energy usage per capita

Source?

Would you be willing to stand behind the claim that official measures of inflation, cost-of-living etc accurately reflect what's happening in the economy as opposed to being massaged and shaped for political messaging purposes?

Yes. Or rather, I have not yet seen any evidence of the latter, so I have no reason to believe it.

demagogic tactic

If this is demagogic then so is literally all of politics and I would hope gun control advocates don't put their gun down first, if you'll pardon the pun.

local asking price is 7000 dollars for cars with 140,000 miles on the clock

That seems very, very high, you can go online and find cars with fewer miles than that in reasonable working order for a quarter the price.

the same people

Which people do you suspect of manufacturing both of these things?

relevant

It's not irrelevant, but if we want to assess how people are doing why would we ever use it instead of real wages?

whether American workers as a collective are actually retraining into better roles is entirely up for dispute

We can avoid this whole question though if we just look at real wages. Which are currently rising.

How is it different in this respect than just ordinary real wages?

they are gamed for political purposes

In what manner? Please read this and tell me which specific elements of their methodology you question. Be specific.

https://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/pdf/cpihom.pdf

Why would we want to adjust for that with ECI? Is workers retraining into better roles not part of an improving economy?

"I'm fine at the moment, but the whole thing seems pretty shaky".

This is a ridiculous extrapolation to make beyond data which cannot be stretched that far. And the question's word was not 'fine' it was 'good'!

They look at pricing of the goods that they have the most exposure

Well good thing we don't need to operate on these general anecdotes and vibes, we can in fact look at statistics.

It's like asking somebody about the weather when they're standing in the eye of a hurricane, it feels fine now but I'm not exactly celebrating yet.

The thing is though, if you ask people most say that they themselves are in the eye of the hurricane. At which point we have to ask how significant the hurricane really is.

You understand this is literally the argument you yourself are making when you suggest we operate off anecdotes and not statistics.

between 50-100%

This number is simply wrong.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIUFDNS

makes for over 25% inflation total

This is more accurate. However, two things to note. Firstly, your quarrel here is not with Joe Biden but American planning law. Secondly, I wonder what happens when we compare nominal wages to average nominal shelter prices - as you can see, they track together since Q1 2021, except for the past few quarters, in which admittedly shelter has outpaced wages. However, it's only one, admittedly large part of the basket, and this is urban rents which one imagines have risen faster than average. So all in all, not convinced.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUSR0000SAS2RS#0

you can expect to pay 2x or more your current mortgage on a comparable home

This number is an exaggeration, but aside from that look at this graph. The increase is clearly well underway pre-Biden. This has nothing to do with Bidenomics. Once again, if you want to blame someone blame NIMBYs.

Edit; just realised I put the wrong graph in and I've lost the right one. But the rent one proves enough I think. Unless this is a statement about interest rate increases, in which case ok but 'I think the government is running too contractionary a monetary policy' is sort of directly at odds with 'I think inflation is too high and it's the government's fault'.

lived experience

Well it's good that you said the term for me, because any 'lived experience' argument would get short shrift here if someone tried to use it on literally any other issue. But because this is an opportunity to shit on Democrats/the left nobody feels the need to have falsifiable beliefs anymore.

This doesn't really address the original arguments in the post. If this is the explanation, then why are ratings of 'am I personally doing well economically' high? The puzzling thing is the discrepancy, this explanation does not address.

complaints are never addressed.

And a good thing too that they never will be, deflation is bad.

Look at your own damn graph! The precipitous fall in debt shown on the second graph comes in... 2008. Does this not perhaps tell us that taking rising debt as a measure of a bad economy is not a good idea?

Pretty much any measure of inflation is coming down at the moment, and is approaching normal levels. And most importantly, wages are rising even faster.

("affordable" used cars aren't a thing anymore),

Not sure what you mean by affordable, but they very much are. Just go on the internet and you can find used cars in working order which do good MPG for pretty damn cheap. Sure, most of them might be on the older side and a bit scratched, but that's hardly that important.

You may well be poorer than you were three years ago. Most people are not - incidentally, much, certainly more than normal, of the wage growth of the recent period has gone to lower income workers, which perhaps indicates why this discourse of a bad economy is tolerated despite the evidence to the contrary. Not sure what else to tell you is that, surprisingly, number continue to the best means of measuring things.

There is no way anyone on this forum would tolerate for a second this kind of 'lived experience' rhetoric if it was about, say, racism.

I've only read that Lee was regarded as a true Southern gentleman his whole life. I don't see that as a myth.

You could (with or without 'Southern' depending on the case) say that, no doubt, about a whole host of basically contemptible people. Between fighting a war to preserve slavery, and being a good chap, the latter struggles to be a minor footnote in his legacy.

refuses to name the player responsible for the death, Matt Petgrave

This is what you would expect, no? There is no public interest from the journalist's perspective in further broadcasting the name - it would be grossly wrong of them to make any insinuation of deliberateness before there is any evidence of such, and if it is indeed just an accident, as I would imagine is overwhelmingly likely, then no point putting him in the story anyway - to be honest he's not even really a public figure. The only results on google for him except about the recent accident are some official league stats pages and a club bio. No more than you'd get for a decent amateur club cricketer. The number of Britons who know his name without knowing him personally would be a rounding error to 0, I imagine. In that light, putting his name in the national press under these circumstances seems unfair.

Sure, but the idea is that one particularly shocking event can be a useful springboard to discuss the wider policy issues that contributed not just to that incident but to many others like it. This happens across all sorts of issues.