FtttG
Gheobhaidh mé bás ar an gcnoc seo.
User ID: 1175
Oh sorry, I get you.
I strongly suspect that a man being pinned to the ground by six burly security guards and violently struggling throughout would end up with more external injuries compared to an old woman being smothered in her bed with a pillow.
Analysis is live now! Although you may have to wait for the mods to approve it.
There's an entire section about the subset you fall into.
Huh?
A few weeks ago some Irish rent-a-cops suffocated a man to death.
Now sources have told The Irish Mirror that an initial post-mortem examination which took place this week has not found any signs of foul play - and no visible external injuries on Mr Sakila's body.
We were good as married in my mind,
But married in my mind's no good.
A few weeks ago some Irish rent-a-cops suffocated a man to death.
My understanding is that the autopsy has yet to determine if that was the cause of death.
Glad to hear you're feeling better. Last year I had Covid for probably the third or fourth time and it was some of the worst pain I'd ever experienced, just splitting headaches for days.
Brazilian women is "too overwhelmed" by living in a new country to be in a relationship, which is such bullshit because she just changed all her hinge photos.
In her defense, Brazilian women tend to be very promiscuous. Just because she doesn't want to be in a relationship doesn't mean she doesn't want to fuck lots of American boys. Also, I thought you'd already lost interest in her?
Indeed, there are two scenes in Goodfellas in which Tommy DeVito responds to comparably mild insults ("Now go home and get your fucking shine box", "Why don't you go fuck yourself, Tommy?") by outright murdering the people who voiced them. The point of these scenes is to establish that Tommy is a psycho.
Who's the lucky laid-y?
I believe the videos recovered from Nowak's phone/Snapchat depict him calling Digwa a "bad man". I guess technically calling someone a "bad man" is an insult, although a laughably mild one. Even in the parallel woke universe in which calling a person of colour a "nigger" or a "Paki" constitutes such a grave insult to their character that they are entitled to murder you in retribution, "bad man" doesn't rise to that level of insult.
I endorse this definition.
The term "fight", to my mind, implies that the two men were attacking each other. Likewise "fistfight" implies that both men were punching each other. I don't think "one man insults another man, to which the second man responds by physically assaulting the first man" can reasonably be characterised as a "fight". Despite Digwa's insistence that Nowak attacked him first and he was defending himself, he was unable to present any evidence that this was the case, and there were no cuts or bruises on his person at the time of his arrest.
So: I think the claim that "Nowak and Digwa got into a fistfight" is simply untrue. No one has presented any evidence that Nowak punched (or even tried to punch) Digwa. If you said "Nowak insulted Digwa, and Digwa responded by stabbing him", I'd have no objection.
One was a case of "two hotheads get into a fight at pub closing time, unfortunately someone is dead because someone else brought a knife to a fistfight".
What a despicably misleading gloss of the Nowak murder. There is zero evidence that Nowak assaulted Digwa, or that he was a "hothead".
New Year's resolution check-in:
- Posted my thirteenth blog post of the year yesterday, concerning the murder of Henry Nowak and how the case was covered by the progressive media (expanded from two comments I posted here).
- Went to the gym three times last week, two days of cardio and one day of deadlifting. Planning to go this evening. Can deadlift 1.84x my bodyweight for 3 reps, squat 1.22x for 8 reps and bench press .87x for 6 reps.
- Have not consumed any pornography since waking up on January 1st.
How goes it @self_made_human, @thejdizzler, @birb_cromble, @ThomasdelVasto and @falling-star?
I would genuinely love to hear some of the music you've created, if you'd be interested in sharing via DM.
Orwell addressed this dilemma/paradox in "The Lion and the Unicorn". How can you be patriotic to the idea of something you're intending to completely alter from the ground up? The answer seems to be "it's tricky, but it can be done". Russians really did seem able to transplant/displace their patriotic fervour from Czarist Russia to the Soviet Union with minimal difficulty.
Love of one's country is just one of many kinds of love, all of which have to deal with this contradiction to a greater or lesser extent. Unlike what that one movie from the 70s would have us believe, love does not mean never having to say you're sorry. Saying you're sorry and promising to do better is a big part of love. Just because you love someone doesn't mean you can never criticise them or request that they change their behaviour. Sometimes this is "tough love" (i.e. because you love them, you hate to see them behaving in a self-destructive fashion), but sometimes it's not.
But it wasn't zero.
This seems like hair-splitting. For most of the history of what we call Britain, the non-white population was as close to zero as made no difference, a rounding error. Until the mid-twentieth century, the majority of the British population could go their entire lives without encountering a single non-white person inside British borders.
I never used to hear about racial problems with minorities in Britain
By "racial problems with minorities", are you referring to racism experienced by minorities, or problems with racial minorities committing disproportionate numbers of crimes etc.? I'm not sure what timeframe "I never used to" covers, but in either case, it's not a new phenomenon.
For the former, the racially motivated murder of Stephen Lawrence in 1993 sent shockwaves throughout the UK, and was the subject of a government inquiry which concluded that the British police service was institutionally racist. (The handcuffing of Henry Nowak is ultimately downstream of recommendations made by said inquiry.) The murder was the impetus for new legislation surrounding double jeopardy in murder trials.
For the latter, last week we discussed Enoch Powell's (in)famous "rivers of blood" speech. He was sounding the alarm about the increased crime and societal dysfunction that appears to accompany mass immigration as early as 1968. While the grooming gangs scandal only really became common knowledge in the 2010s, it had been ongoing since the mid-90s.
No idea, but in Northern Ireland it means loyal to the crown.
Broadly: I think in the twentieth century we tore down a huge proportion of our most long-standing institutions, or dramatically scaled back the extent of their power and influence, or they collapsed under the weight of their own contradictions. Whatever the many and varied deficiencies of these institutions, they were load-bearing in the sense of providing a unified Western telos. Many people, I think, did not recognise that a proper society needs an orienting telos to function properly; or were naïve enough to think that, once we abolished all the old decrepit institutions which had systematically kept the truth from us, a new telos would manifest itself of its own accord. But a telos doesn't just happen, any more than a ship or a factory does: it has to be patiently grown, constructed and tended to. It's a fragile, delicate thing. I have a lot of criticisms of the Catholic Church, and in its modern diminished capacity it's a shadow of its former self, but I can't dispute that, at the peak of its power and influence in Ireland, it did provide a telos, an orienting principle, something to work towards. When people talk about the crisis of meaning in Western society, this is what they're getting at. Nothing the progressive coalition has offered as an alternative telos fits the bill ("diversity" is an instrumental goal, not a terminal one; "equality" is a relative and hence meaningless goal, likewise "inclusion"). I don't think modern Anglophone conservatism has much to offer in terms of a telos either. We have technological and economic wonders at our disposal, but are beset with indecision as to what to use them for. We built a spaceship without deciding where we wanted to go with it.
Either that, or the phones.
Well, I'm not sure if I accept the premise on two fronts. I'm not necessarily persuaded that narcissism is the primary root of all the problems in the West. However, I think the excesses of trans activism are a perfect example of a problem which is ultimately downstream of narcissism.
- Prev
- Next

My understanding of monogamy is that it's a mutual arrangement, where two people both agree to be romantically and sexually exclusive with one another. "I'm going to be romantically or sexually exclusive with you, but I don't care whether you're exclusive with me" sounds... rather far removed from a conventional understanding of what "monogamy" is. I believe @ymeskhout once had a rather lengthy back-and-forth with Aella regarding her personal definition of what polygamy is, which seems to overlap with this person's conception of themselves as monogamous.
I had the same thought myself.
More options
Context Copy link