@CryptoWitch's banner p

CryptoWitch

Live From New Vegas

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 00:27:19 UTC

				

User ID: 301

CryptoWitch

Live From New Vegas

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 00:27:19 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 301

You’re right on the BMI scale, but the above poster wouldn’t qualify for most reasonable measures of obesity. BMI is good for population obesity measures, but quickly falls apart when you start seriously weight training. And a 3x body weight deadlift (at 235 pounds!) is extremely far to the right tail of the population strength curve; Strength Standards calls that an ‘elite’ lift (1), and it’s comparing to a population of people who actively train for strength. I would feel confident suggesting this is something that less than 0.1% of the population can do.

Now, I also think it’s likely that the above poster was using PEDs to support supraphysiologic muscle mass, as well. Not to cast aspersions, but merely to point out that with chemical assistance it’s certainly possible.

You’re right about 150 lbs / 6’ not being close to Auschwitz level, but it’s also a little insincere to suggest that it’s a ‘normal’ body weight. At 20.3 BMI, it’s less than 2 points from being underweight (18.5). At least in our society, I think it would commonly be agreed (as you say) that that’s pretty darn skinny.

For a personal anecdote, I’ve been both 130 and 240 pounds (at 6’3) and while the former was extremely skinny, the latter looked very good (as a bodybuilder, 10% or so body fat and yes, PEDs) despite being the cutoff for obesity according to BMI.

1)https://strengthlevel.com/strength-standards/deadlift/lb

Tagging on to your top level post to ask a question of the other users. Several have mentioned that AMPH is a ‘better’ class of stimulant than MPH. Why do people feel this way? Subjectively, it seems like amph is ‘speedier’, which means more enjoyable but also more prone to distraction, and with a bigger lag/crash after it wears off. Mph, in contrast, feels like less of a boost and more of a removal of fatigue, with less of a crash (but potentially a headache later).

Obviously responses are individual. What is the rest of the Motte’s experience?

In contrast to some of the other commenters, I first stumbled upon porn at age 10 (decades ago). While I didn’t know what it was at first, I still got an erection and proceeded to take care of business (albeit with some false starts and a significant amount of uncertainty about exactly what was happening).

My age group was aware of sex at that time, but in a more theoretical way. It was something obviously cool to do, even if we were fuzzy on the details, and if you didn’t want it then you were obviously gay, or so we thought, and that was bad.

Notably, despite years of porn and masturbation, I didn’t actually become genuinely romantically attracted to women for a number of years after that (14-16, maybe?).

So my experience suggests the physicality can be there early, and some will be curious and have the opportunity.

I sadly don’t have much to add, but want to commend you for taking the time to do these informative and helpful write ups. It’s really nice to get insight into things happening across the world and I’m grateful to you for it.

To whatever mods may see my post and think it’s low effort—I plead (somewhat) guilty. I’m not posting a top-level comment for a reason. However, I want to encourage the excellent @Soriek to continue his work, and I think an occasional comment speaks more loudly than an upvote.

In actual transnational news, I recently became aware of a Russian program to try and improve their fertility rate by offering a large sum of money (enough to buy an apartment) to young couples who have multiple kids. I do not speak Russian, but if there’s interest I could try to understand what’s happening and post about it?

How about some culture war? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/30/how-gang-violence-took-hold-of-sweden-in-five-charts

While I imagine the Guardian is persona non grata around here, this seems to me to be pretty stunning. Sweden, long the darling of the left, is now “… in the grip of a rise in gang violence and shootings that has taken citizens and leaders by surprise. In the words of the prime minister, Ulf Kristersson, this year: “Sweden has never before seen anything like this. No other country in Europe is seeing anything like this.””

I’m leery of rephrasing the article excessively, but it does note that gun crime and narcotics have been rising since 2013, and that the gun murder rate in the capital of Stockholm is now 30 times that of London.

The fairly standard claim (this is the Guardian, after all) is that this has to do with poverty, not migration.

“Socioeconomic factors are what mostly constitute the risks of ending up in crime,” not ethnicity, says Felipe Estrada Dörner, a professor of criminology at Stockholm University whose research centres on juvenile delinquency and segregation. “This is a classic and well known pattern, in Sweden and internationally.”

Estrada Dörner says accelerating this trend and reversing other aspects of socioeconomic decline should be prioritised. “In order to slow down the supply of new recruits to gangs, inequality must be reduced. Harsher punishments, which the government invests a lot of resources in now, will not overcome those problems.”

So… Is the solution, now that mass migration has been accomplished, to make sure that they have just as much money as the original Swedes? Given the Swedish welfare state was already extremely generous, which drove all the immigration, is that feasible?

Just wanted to echo some of the other commenters and state that I appreciate your posting these Transnational Thursdays. I don’t have enough background on some of these countries to comment to the level of erudition that this forum demands, but I hope you will continue to post. If I see and know something in the future I’ll happily share it.

Kosovo

In April Kosovar Serbians boycotted municipal elections, which were then won by Albanian candidates who tried to install their candidates by force, leading to ethnic violence and dozens of injuries. By now 4000 NATO Peace Keepers have entered Kosovo to stave off the rising ethnic tensions. Serbia’s troops are currently mobilized on the border and they have now threatened to militarily intervene if ethnic Serbs aren’t protected from Albanian violence.

I find this particularly interesting given Serbia’s at times uneasy alignment with the West. If Serbian troops were to enter Kosovo, ostensibly to protect ethnic Serbs… Might we run into a situation where Serbian troops end up firing on NATO peacekeepers (perhaps intervening in a pogrom of Albanians)? If so, does that push Serbia further into the arms of Russia, and could it change any power dynamics as regards the Ukraine war? I note that Hungary is already oriented towards Russia; while there seems to be no way for Russia to easily support Serbia in attempted ethnic cleansing, further strife in the area seems capable of causing the EU further headaches on their eastern front.

I see the potential attack vector, and both of those solutions seem like good ways around them. Medals and cosmetic hats both are great ways to encourage helping mod! Although if you do do hats, perhaps gate them to the number of comments successfully approved, rather than the total amount of modding done? I think that little bit of mystery would help to interest people all the more in modding properly.

Anyways, thank you for making this community possible! I’ve left Reddit entirely with the new third-party-app debacle, and this is now my only source of online debate.

Thank you for calling out the people doing the volunteer moderating! I mostly browse the Motte before bed, and am rarely in the mood to make an effort post (or generally argue on the internet) and don’t want to post a ‘+1’ to avoid consensus building. It’s nice to know there’s something I can do as a lurker.

I know there are a million ‘to-do’ things- but might it be possible to show how much a volunteer’s thoughts reflect the mod’s, perhaps with some sort of (private?) “percent agreement”? I wonder if that might be a useful way to help people get better at it, and thereby take effort off the mods over time.

Generally very effective. Tasers can be ineffective in some situations, such as the target wearing thick clothing and an unlucky shot, but high voltage will work well on a large man.

Note that I have not shot someone with a taser; this is what I have heard secondhand. I am a large man who has completed a high-voltage circuit with my body, though, and I assure you the only thing on my mind was making it stop.

Commenting to add a +1 to the desire for it; while effortposts are always preferable, bare links are better than nothing. Might as well enjoy our newfound freedoms!

Hello Mottizens!

Long time lurker posting to show my support of us moving to the new site.

The Motte is dead! Long love the Motte!