Crowstep
22d ago
Here's everyone's daily reminder that the standard melatonin dose sold (10mg) is literally 100x too strong. 0.1mg is much more effective.
Crowstep
22d ago
a 1990s-Bill-Clinton analogue
That's possibly the only take on Trump I've seen that argues he's too moderate.
Left-wingers might say he's a fascist or whatever, right-wingers might say he's boorish or distractable or egotistic. I don't think I've heard any of them say he's not extreme enough.
Could you elaborate?
Crowstep
23d ago
win every election going forward
They thought that would happen before, it didn't.
African Americans, Latinos and Asians are all shifting right, and increasingly voting Republican. The younger they are and the more they identify as American (as opposed to their ethnic identities) the more likely they are to support the GOP.
The old patterns are breaking down and being replaced by new ones. Men vs women, college-educated vs non-college-educated, married vs unmarried are going to be the relevant demographic criteria of the next few decades, I would predict.
Crowstep
24d ago
podcast host Tony Hinchcliffe added that Latinos "love making babies" and that they do not "pull out," comments that leaned into a racist trope that Latinos are preoccupied with childbearing and averse to birth control.
The irony is that the age of the big Catholic family in Latin America is over. Mexico has a lower birth rate than the USA. Puerto Rico's TFR is lower than Singapore!
Crowstep
24d ago
Have you considered not worrying too much about it and just going with your gut?
The chance that your vote is the deciding one is effectively zero. You shouldn't think too much about it.
Crowstep
27d ago
Sounds like a potential for some arbitrage. If my understanding of it is right, someone could buy 100 shares in Harris to lose (M53) and 100 shares in Trump to lose (M40) for a total of M93. Then win M100 regardless of which candidate wins.
When I originally wrote that comment I used dollars, before realising that Manifold doesn't use actual money. My guess is that this explains the discrepancy. Nobody really cares about arbitrage if the only prize is pretend internet points.
Crowstep
28d ago
I guess a young woman who identifies as queer or bisexual doesn't have to actually do anything. She doesn't even have to dress any differently. All she does is collect a cool new identity label that her peers will praise her for. Combine that with the fact that most women are a little bisexual anyway (but usually don't act on it) and I can see why these labels are popular. For a young man, it's similarly easy to pick up one of the many bespoke identity labels and not actually change anything about his behaviour or even dress.
By contrast, actually acting on a minority sexuality actually requires them to, you know, act. For straight men (of whom I think most are instinctively repulsed by the idea of sex with a man) this isn't going to happen. And for bi-curious women, this requires her to either take the initiative (which women hate) or wait on a lesbian to come and try to convert her (many such cases, but I doubt there are enough lesbians to make a difference in the stats).
Crowstep
29d ago
We have not seen "peak woke". We probably won't live long enough to see "peak woke." It's going to just keep getting worse for the rest of our lives.
There's a lot of data suggesting that we really have passed peak woke. 2020 seems to have been the inflection point.
Crowstep
29d ago
I'm really talking about walkability. It doesn't matter if the residents describe the commercial area as part of the suburb if they have to get a car there. Once you're driving, it may as well be in another town.
Crowstep
30d ago
'Amidst the houses' is the suburb. If there's a zone for housing and a zone for commercial, then the housing bit is the suburb, from the perspective of the residents.
By contrast, in the UK there are pubs and shops nestled in between houses. To take a random example, the suburb Jesmond, in Newcastle. Look at it on Google Maps. It includes two metro stations, bus stops, pubs, restaurants, playing fields, hotels, parks, churches, allotments, schools, cafes and small businesses. You can easily walk from any part of the suburb to any other part, and you can get public transport to the rest of the city.
When I look at (also randomly chosen) Rio Rancho in Albuquerque, I see vast tracts of houses, many located in cul de sacs (so you can walk to the end of your road and that's it) and all of the shops and restaurants are limited to the big road that surrounds the suburb.
Crowstep
30d ago
The most frustrating part about this is that it's still possible to have walkable suburbs. We have them in the Europe. The problem is that US zoning laws usually make it illegal to build anything except houses in suburban areas. In the UK, suburbs have shops, parks, schools and pubs and it is possible to walk to all of them.
Crowstep
30d ago
and it’s obviously in the public interest to keep them on a tight leash
In the UK? Hardly. The country has a tiny number of highly vetted, very well trained firearms officers, supporting a mass of unarmed ordinary police. We have one shooting by police marksmen every few years, and it's almost always a guy who is deep in with armed gangs. Armed police are not a threat to the public at all.
'Keeping them on a tight leash' (i.e. taking the side of criminals they interact with) has the second order effect of emboldening those criminals, which is definitely not in the public interest. We see this every few years when some bright spark in the Met decides that stop and search is racist. The police stop using it for a while, the black on black murder rate spikes, and then they quietly go back to using it because it works.
Crowstep
1mo ago
Even at a meetup, you still have to ask her out and court her yourself. Just because she's in the same room, doesn't mean you're playing with cheat codes.
Crowstep
1mo ago
Interesting, I would say that gregarious and shy are both much stronger words than introverted or extroverted.
Crowstep
1mo ago
My understanding is that, in the developed world, IQ (or at least, earnings and education as IQ proxies) are positively correlated with male fertility but negatively correlated for female fertility.
Basically, smart men earn lots of money and so can attract a wife more easily, while being able to afford to house more children.
Smart women spend their most fertile years in education and 'greedy' careers, leaving little time for babymaking.
High fertility among low IQ people was previously driven by teenage pregnancy, but that has mostly disappeared in the past couple of decades
Crowstep
1mo ago
Seems a pretty bold claim to state to a self-described introvert that introverts don't exist.
The fact that a trait exists on a spectrum doesn't mean that the words we use to describe the ends of the spectrum 'don't exist'. Someone who feels social nine times out of ten is different in a meaningful way from someone who feels social one time out of ten. Why shouldn't we have words to describe them?
I'm not sure what framing you have in your head, but I know people personally who, if I were to not describe them as extroverted would require a deliberate lie on my part.
Crowstep
1mo ago
Honestly I think this is just confirmation bias, like how people think short men are easily angered. You notice the smart people with poor social skills because they are good at everything else and it stands out, perhaps with a touch of the wishful thinking that leads to 'there are different kinds of intelligence and people who are good at one are bad at another'.
Like, let's consider well-known geniuses. Here's a quote about Richard Feynman:
He arrived with a huge friendly beaming smile, more cheerful, I might add, than all the other lecturers put together in our department had ever been. Smiling, he stated, “ you don't need this list, lets just chat freely amongst ourselves" and he screwed the piece of paper up with his hands and threw it in the wastepaper bin beside the lecture table. He talked freely about anything we liked to ask from the deepest theoretical ideas of modern physics, people he'd met and worked with, UFOs and pseudoscientific thinking and he loved jokes and joking around. I've NEVER met anyone so down to earth and so friendly as that. He was lovely! All of us graduate students were at ease and he gave us THREE hours of his time; freely! We didn't know at the time that the staff had asked to attend too. He refused saying this was the students' time..he didn't want us to feel ill at ease. My supervisor told me later he told our head of faculty off saying the staff were probably more interested in paying off their mortgages and worried about their next publishing than fundamental physics..lol. As the organisor, I met him later. I'm part Maori and he was very interested in the New Zealand Maori. He was lovely; nothing was a problem, he was ‘at home' with us students. I remembered seeing him sweat as he expended enormous energy with us. I thought, he's truly human! The most complicated theoretical ideas were made to appear so commonplace and simple, as if you were putting together an extension to your garage. Incredible! The terms in the various differential equations of physics were reduced to seemingly just the different sized nails you needed, with the purposes clearly recognised. Gosh he made it all sound joyful, fun and deceptively obvious. Truly a highlight of my student days. He wanted us students to take him out to a night club. The faculty closed that one down as they'd already accounted for his evenings at other professors' homes. Ohhh .the lost opportunities.
How about Terence Tao:
Tao, by contrast, is, as one colleague put it, ‘‘super-normal.’’ He has a gentle, self-deprecating manner. He eschews job offers from prestigious East Coast institutions in favor of a relaxed, no-drama department in a place where he can enjoy the weather. In class, he conveys a sense that mathematics is fun. One of his students told me that he had recently joked with another about the many ways Tao defies all the Hollywood mad-genius tropes. ‘‘They will never make a movie about him,’’ he said. ‘‘He doesn’t have a troubled life. He has a family, and they seem happy, and he’s usually smiling.’’
"Einstein was a total rogue in his personal life," Isaacson said. "He was a runaway. He always got in trouble with his teachers. Falls in love with this wonderful physics student. They have a child before they're married. All of these things are this rebellious, impudent nature, which I think also leads him to challenge the basic tenets of science."
In conversation, Savant steers clear of fancy remarks. She is overtly normal. “People expect me to be a walking encyclopaedia or a human calculator,” she says, or to “have very unusual, very esoteric, very arcane gifts and I’m really not that way at all.” Instead, she talks with the practised clarity of her columns, the pedantry of someone wary of misinterpretation.
His nickname at the institute of advanced study was “good time Johnny”: he often organized parties in his large home in Princeton, whereby fine wines were consumed, served by a butler, while “Johnny” would divide his time between meeting friends, telling politically incorrect jokes, talking higher math, and telling the occasional dirty joke.
I promise I didn't select these deliberately. Einstein seems to have been an asshole, the same to a lesser extent seems to be true of Von Neumann, but these were not autistic nerds who didn't understand people.
Crowstep
1mo ago
That stereotype is, as far as we know, incorrect. Intelligence is positively correlated with empathy, prosociality and morality. Academic success also seems to correlate with empathy.
Which makes sense, if you look outside of carefully curated bubbles. Who do you think is more empathetic, university graduates or unemployed members of the underclass?
Crowstep
1mo ago
I noticed that too. Also that the story came out in the Guardian, Britain's main left wing newspaper.
What I really want to know is, what does the median Guardian reader actually think about this? I'm sure that most would reflexively condemn it, but a significant portion of those gladly send their children to private schools to give them an advantage or will have used IVF themselves. I wish the comments section was left open.
Crowstep
1mo ago
I'm seeing a few comments like this but they're all frustratingly vague. What specific negative traits do you mean?
Crowstep
1mo ago
We've had IQ tests for about a century now. Don't you think we would have noticed if there was actually some advantage to being stupid in that time? Why would another 20 years make a difference?
What kind of positive traits would you expect to find?
Crowstep
1mo ago
I do agree that I don't expect this to change the world drastically. Most babies will continue to be born the old-fashioned way.
But you're assuming that this technology doesn't change the kind, or number of parents that get IVF. Think about tiger parents who send their three year old children to pre-MBA programmes. Do you think they wouldn't be willing to do something that actually makes a difference to their future children's outcomes? Even if it is only 2 IQ points, that's worth more than violin lessons or debate club.
Plus, we can reasonably expect the price to come down as more companies enter the space (there are already two that I know of). Soon enough, I expect the current 'doctor eyeballs the embryos to decide which one to implant' to be replaced with genetic testing in most IVF clinics. If you're already paying for the IVF, why not pay a little extra to give your future child a better chance in life?
Crowstep
1mo ago
I wouldn't be so skeptical. As the article says, the first embryos have already been implanted. Plus, Heliospect is not the only company offering this service. Steven Hsu's company Genomic Prediction did the same thing for eccentric pronatalists Simone and Malcolm Collins. The first embryo selected child (that is publicly known) is toddling around a house in Pennsylvania.
Crowstep
1mo ago
I think you're right. Hell, I thought that until I read your post. Then I remembered that 'OK Boomer' was a meme several years before the pandemic.
I assume that Zoomer was just meant as a portmanteau of Boomer and Gen Z (which itself was based on the letter convention that started with Gen X).
I'm pretty sure the debates around the Ukraine war on here have revolved around the morality of other western countries helping Ukraine vs avoiding foreign entanglements. People weren't arguing over whether Russia actually invaded or the minutiae of what was happening on the frontlines.
More options
Context Copy link