A value that's still more than you sitting around and doing whatever else you do.
I disagree. Doing whatever I want without having to consider what Zeus might think of it has value unto itself. I'm not pulling a mythology out of a hat and basing my life around it because there's an abstract philosophical nonzero chance that Tiamat is real or something and maybe I'll have lucked out and guessed correctly.
Scott Alexander is hysterically overrated just because he actually criticized wokes a bit back during the era where the spineless techies that make up his fandom were busy cowering and licking progressive boots.
Isn't doing nothing the most foolish option, due to Pascal's wager?
Take the chance that God even exists in the first place, then divide that by the chances that he doesn't care about worship, or doesn't like cynical odds-based worship, or doesn't actually punish anyone, then divide whatever value you have left at this point by all the mutually exclusive religious options with nothing in particular to recommend them over one another, and what are you really left with?
Nothing worth restructuring your life over. If I actually considered vague abstract probabilities like this worth acting on I'd probably be doing all kinds of dumb shit all the time.
But we're supposed to be on the same side. Just you wait until they hear about this at the next gay trans furry meeting, bucko.
Gay/Trans/Furry PC-Gamer Master-Race rise up.
Hey, you know what would really stick it to the gay trans furry PC master Hot Topic race? You completing your argument.
Hoff said something to the effect of "here are some assumptions based on observed characteristics that regular people make all the time, explain why racial ones are uniquely different" like three days ago and you've done everything in the world except answer him ever since.
He's trying to "build consensus" by claiming that a position is uncontroversial when it is very clearly not
Wait, are you having this big dumb embarrassing meltdown because you genuinely think positions like "the elderly are typically feebler than the young" are controversial, or did you just suffer a critical failure of reading comprehension at some point and now you mistakenly think we meant that racial stereotypes are uncontroversial?
I responded that from a Western/Culturally Christian perspective, yes it is a bad thing and provided a rationale. Specifically that the emphasis on individual merit is a key component of what sets "the West" apart, and that racial discrimination goes against that.
And when he provided numerous uncontroversial examples of other situations in which a person makes assumptions based on observable traits, you shamelessly ducked having to explain why those are different.
Guessing that an elderly person is likely to be weaker than a young person, or that a bearded man in a keffiyeh might not want any bacon, is just common sense. But you apparently don't have an arrow in your quiver that explains why some assumptions "go against individual merit" while others don't, so instead you just muttered something about not being gish galloped even though that's blatantly not what was happening.
Big fat L.
Ive been around the internet enough to know that engaging with the specifics of a Gish Gallop is a fool's game. That's why I didn't.
Nah man you shamelessly ducked. Massive L.
I mean Kasparov got buzzed by the dongcopter back in like 08. It's not hard to imagine putting a bomb in there.
Lower class black regressive muslims living in the desert can define gender however they want, as long as it doesn't infringe on my rights. Then everyone can decide which culture they would rather live in, and everyone can be happy.
Oh please, the entire LGBT project is only kept alive by the Dems capturing working-class minority votes with other issues and then leveraging them toward a cause that minority base mostly finds sickening. Letting everyone just "decide" is the last thing you want.
That's why Trump's campaign attacks on the issue and electoral gains among minorites were so significant. The Democratic Party doesn't need to be utterly routed in order to be defeated here, merely forced to choose between drag parties on the White House lawn and maintaining its blue collar minority voting base. Given how quickly Newsom jumped ship on the trans sports thing, it's safe to say they're already feeling the pinch.
the word "man" refers more to an abstract social construct than something people are born with.
Only in the minds of a very specific cohort of predominantly white middle to upper-middle class progressives mostly located in particular urban enclaves in Western Europe and coastal North America. Nobody else ever bought into it. The aforementioned cohort is drastically over-represented among the media and loves telling itself that everyone agrees with it, but for the first time in living memory it really is going to be defeated on one of its pet social causes.
There's still a slight chance I can squeeze you in, especially if you can commune with animals or something. Maybe like get a ferret to steal someone's keys, that kind of thing.
They can mint a single 1 quadrillion USD platinum coin and just put it into the account of the treasury.
So anyway I'm putting a little team together. At the very least I need a computer hacker, a tough guy, a demolitions expert, and someone who knows how to hang from the ceiling like that bit in Mission Impossible. Bonus points if you have a quirky personality, a cool accent, or an eyepatch.
Yeah this sounds like fattycope.
The principal works. The problem I see with CICO is that it’s kinda like telling a drug addict that they just need to not do drugs. It’s true, the best thing a drug addict can do is not do drugs, but the advice if that is as far as it goes is precisely useless because it does tell people how to actually stop using the drugs. Better advice would include changing your routines and habits to avoid triggers and easy access to drugs, and finding things to do that fill your days with happiness without the drugs.
Providing optimal advice to drug addicts is something I have neither the education nor inclination to do, but I'm still going to snort when a bunch of crackheads on Facebook or whatever start badmouthing the "drugs in drugs out theory" and telling me they get high no matter how little they smoke.
I voted for Trump three times and as far as I'm concerned this term has been nothing but a big wet fart so far. It's just been one embarrassing clusterfuck after another accompanied by a perpetual drumbeat of asspulled contradictory coping from his fanboys on Twitter.
-
Trump has a cockamamie idea about acquiring Greenland. Denmark promptly tells him to blow it out his ass, at which point Mr. Art of the Deal is completely out of ideas. He just lamely brings it up now and then seemingly at random, even though everyone knows it'll never happen, just to remind us what a limp dick he is.
-
Trump wants Canada to become a state. Maybe. Nobody seems sure whether he's serious about this or if it's just a rhetorical salvo in his ongoing mission to antagonize them for no comprehensible reason. In any event Canada tells him to blow statehood out of his ass too, and in the end the only result is to bail out the Canadian Liberal party.
-
Trump announces infinite tariffs on everything because he's a dumbfuck and thinks anyone will bother to build a factory here rather than just wait a little bit for this to blow over. He wipes a zillion dollars off the stock market and then mostly folds like a bitch anyway.
-
Edited to add: Oh yeah, and where the hell are my apocalyptic mass deportations?
Art of the Deal my fat ass. All this guy's selling me is the idea that he really is a boob and his first term was only as decent as it was because he wasn't really expecting to win or prepared to do anything.
I'm not sure I'm getting my point across. You're still talking about the object level impact of the tariffs. I'm talking about the ability of the state to translate will into action when the action involves short term pain.
It would help if that action weren't transparently dumb and futile.
But it is very tiring to see people suddenly pop up acting like they're experts after months of low/no engagement, just because they suddenly have a stick they can hit people with.
Trump blowing his own foot off and staggering around bleeding while the stock market tanks and his supporters flood the internet with contradictory asspulled copes about what he might be trying to do isn't actually tiresome or boring, no matter how little some people want to talk about it. If you guys don't like it, minimize the subthreads like everyone else does for everything else they don't care about.
Interesting, it's literally more nerfed than it was a couple days ago.
Uh huh, now step aside, every other religion in the world is in line behind you waiting to give the same speech.
I haven't seen anyone make reference to it and there doesn't seem to be much awareness of it, so I'll just point out that if you tell Grok to "become unhinged" it'll discard almost all of its filters and do pretty much anything you ask of it. No need for fancy jailbreaks, it'll discuss taboo subjects using all the slurs you want. Unhinged mode comes with a sort of performative edgelord tone, but there's no reason you can't tell it to knock that routine off and just play with an otherwise normal LLM that's running almost totally uncensored.
posts the words 'based', 'cringe', 'redpilled', 'pepe' and 'kino' because no LLM would ever use it in their speech.
possibly 100%
The odds of me shitting my pants in the next five minutes are possibly 100%. I probably won't, but if I do then I guess the odds were 100% all along. Also you're not obliterating the industrial capacity of China WW2-style with anything less than carpet-nuking.
Nah dog, that's crazy talk. It's Trump, doing the opposite of him is the only thing the Dems really stand for. They'd want to overturn this shit even if the tariffs were actually good.
- Prev
- Next
Based.
More options
Context Copy link