@FtttG's banner p

FtttG

Gheobhaidh mé bás ar an gcnoc seo.

7 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 13 13:37:36 UTC

https://firsttoilthenthegrave.substack.com/


				

User ID: 1175

FtttG

Gheobhaidh mé bás ar an gcnoc seo.

7 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 13 13:37:36 UTC

					
				

				

				

				

				

					

User ID: 1175

I'm no longer convinced the words "racism", "white supremacy", "sexism", "misogyny", "Islamophobia", "homophobia", "transphobia", "hate", "fascism", "far-right", "genocide" and "lynching" mean anything at all.

Something something JK Rowling "preached hate" against a vulnerable minority group, freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences blah blah blah

Gary is a "there but for the grace of God go I" situation. What he did was in clear contravention of the law. Philosophically, I accept that the state is supposed to have a monopoly on legitimate use of force, extreme circumstances excepted (which does not describe Gary's circumstances). Does the foregoing mean I wouldn't have done the exact same thing in his shoes? Sadly, I don't think so.

no one argues he isn’t guilty of the charges

Many do, in fact, argue he isn't guilty of the charges. I've spent long hours remonstrating with these people, but they refuse to listen.

All I can say is that feeling extremely horny in your late teens is completely normal and you have nothing to worry about. There is nothing medically or psychologically wrong with you.

To quote TV Tropes:

Sonny is so well-endowed that sex is uncomfortable for most of his partners. Even "the most hardened and fearless putain" demands double price, and his wife is actually glad that he's cheating on her, since it means she won't need to have sex with him as often (though she does start to complain when he neglects her too long). When he meets Lucy, a woman whose vagina can comfortably acommodate him, their affair is intense. Meanwhile, Lucy has the female version of this problem: her capacious vagina is the result of a weakened pelvic floor which prevents her from enjoying sex with any man less-endowed than Sonny, and which needs surgical correction lest it cause even more serious problems later in life.

Well, indirectly. I was thinking of the cavernous vulva.

I did something similar recently, looking at all the notches on my bedpost and sorting them by ethnicity, body shape and breast size.

Unsurprisingly, slim Asian women with small breasts predominated.

I'm not sure if spiritual adaptations should count. Although I suppose Heart of Darkness is in the public domain.

Fight Club is worth reading once, but the film is definitely superior. Even the author thinks the film has a better ending.

It's more than twenty years since I read The Godfather, but the film was wise to drop one of the novel's most bizarre and out-of-place subplots.

I can't think of any adaptations that are very different to the source material but still good

The Shining? Most Hitchcock movies? The Shawshank Redemption departs from its source material in lots of subtle ways. LA Confidential retains the feel of its source novel, although the plot is dramatically simplified and the more extreme content toned down. Trainspotting is less like a novel and more like a collection of short stories set in the same universe, especially compared to the film's streamlined plot. Minority Report had the exact opposite message to its source material. Children of Men is brilliant, but my understanding is that it has little in common with the source material beyond the basic premise of a fertility crisis and some of the characters' names. The director didn't even read the book his film was based on.

I don't know why you'd list a bunch of movies and TV shows you haven't seen to contradict the claim that movies are bad. How do you know they prove your point?

Certainly she was widely considered one of the most desirable women in the world at the tail end of the 2000s.

I found my bottom-quartile female classmates significantly more attractive just on the basis that they were younger and physically present in the room with me.

Well, that hardly seems like an apples-to-apples comparison. Presumably if you had a choice between having sex with one of your bottom-quartile female classmates and having sex with Megan Fox, you'd opt for the latter.

I'm curious who your friends considered a ten that you disagreed with.

Point taken, although I took @thejdizzler's point to be "Hollywood no longer knows how to make adaptations that are good movies" rather than "Hollywood no longer knows how to make faithful adaptations".

When were adaptations good in your experience?

Let's have a look at what Rotten Tomatoes considers the 300 best movies of all time:

  • The Godfather (#1)
  • Rear Window (#4)
  • LA Confidential (#5)
  • The Battle of Algiers (#9)
  • Schindler's List (#10)
  • Cool Hand Luke (#23)
  • How to Train Your Dragon (#25)
  • The Godfather pt. 2 (#28)
  • Dr. Strangelove (#36)
  • The Wages of Fear (#40)
  • The Maltese Falcon (#41)
  • Spotlight (#42)
  • Grave of the Fireflies (#44)
  • Psycho (#46)
  • The Wizard of Oz (#49)

That's just from the top fifty: according to ChatGPT, 29% of the list are adaptations of one kind or another.

Probably true, now that you mention it.

Girl next door is a compliment, surely.

I think that has more to do with someone's interests than their appearance.

I assume @ArjinFerman was referring to how many state benefits the modal migrant can expect to receive in the UK vs. France.

I'm actually quite annoyed at your glib dismissal of my post and your insistence that these people cannot possibly mean what they say, especially when the literal Prime Minister of the UK has not ruled out the possibility of a public inquiry into the media's handling of the Arday case:

Calls are growing for an investigation into media reporting of the case. An open letter to Andy Burnham demanding a public inquiry “to ensure we never see a tragic death like Dr Arday’s again” has gathered more than 85,000 names.

The prime minister is said to be open to the idea and has not ruled out “Leveson 2” – the planned second part of the earlier inquiry into British press standards, which was cancelled in 2018.

Baby boomers and Gen Xers described a woman of average attractiveness (neither ugly nor hot) as "plain". Gen Z describes such women as "mid".

Does no equivalent word exist for Millennials?

How old are you? And how high is your libido?

It was bad enough to suggest that some sorts of outrage only come from people lying about their beliefs.

Why was it "bad enough"? What was "bad enough"? Shame on me for daring to suggest that a person who refuses to give a straight answer to a simple factual question might not be being entirely honest. Yes, I do in fact think that some people just go on the internet in front of their constituents and tell lies.

Why? What’s wrong with the first answer?

As mentioned by someone downthread, multiple things can be true at once. It can simultaneously be true that some people signing this petition think it's a sensible no-brainer of a proposal, while others have no expectation of anything like it passing into law, and are simply using it as a means to vent their frustration or signal their in-group. I know this, I'm not an idiot.

I really don't get what the complaint is here. On the one hand, you criticised me for accusing politicians of lying. At the same time, you're saying "the people who signed this petition don't really mean it, they're just pounding their chests, don't take them so seriously". In other words, you're criticising me for – taking what they say at face value and not assuming they're lying about their intentions. Which one is it? Should I call people liars, or not?

"It's bad when you assume that people who give evasive non-answers to simple factual questions aren't being entirely honest about what they believe. It's also bad when you don't assume that people aren't being sincere in their motivations for signing a petition." What do you want from me, exactly?

Ha ha, point and laugh at the Limeys.

Believe me when I tell you that I treat Limeys with far more charity and forbearance than the average Irishman does.