netstack
The horse embodies the wings a person feels inside.
No bio...
User ID: 647
Worse…they’re weird escorts!
Such is the burden of tabloid news.
I’m pretty sure that covers “camp follower” too, mind you.
I suppose this cements “the grass is always greener…” as the world’s oldest fallacy.
Measuring one’s life against the most lurid possible comparison is a proud tradition. The difference between your reaction and a kid wanting to be a big rock star is that you don’t actually like the prospect of being in that position. Probably. I’m not gonna judge.
as opposed to just leeching off the government, doing some sort of NGO/media grift, or even just getting a random remote job and going to live cheap in Thailand
Note that these are VERY different options. Unlike prostitution, you could almost certainly work your way into any one of them depending on your risk tolerance. But, like, why should you? Is the expected value of any of those options actually higher? Does it outweigh the added risk?
Point is, that tweet is engagement bait. I can’t endorse forming economic opinions based on a platform that hates you rewards style over substance. Twitter delenda est.
Buddy, I can’t even tell what you’re asking, but I find it vaguely insulting.
C’mon.
This has none of the hallmarks of whitewashing a vigilante. The perpetrator didn’t make that argument. The state certainly didn’t.
A society doesn't normally prosecute soldiers for murder,
Yes, it does. Sometimes even when they have explicit orders and state support, which this guy emphatically did not. Contrary to popular belief, killing enemy combatants is surprisingly regulated.
Why else do you think only that group is de facto allowed to go around armed?
Western countries have a reasonably long history with something called “freedom of religion.” The British version was usually more concerned with Papists, but it has adopted the usual suite of protections for sincere religious beliefs.
English society
Who, exactly, do you think is calling the shots here? Have you actually seen people calling him a soldier, or are you overfitting your own model?
to kill its enemies for their crime of existing, or "racism" for short
An absurd sleight of hand. I think you’re assigning a whole package of beliefs to a nebulous group of your political enemies, none of which are particularly coherent. Would it be reasonable to call that “stupidity”?
I’ll say I didn’t have any real reason for that; hence the approval. But we’ve always been vaguely bemused when people want to do top-level posts. Odds are you’ll get better visibility this way, at least?
It's not against the rules.
Though I suppose I would have preferred it go in the SSQ thread.
You're the human control group. I feel like we're lucky to have you.
It hasn’t even been a month since we told you not to flip out in this exact situation.
Three days this time.
Upsetting people doesn't make something unethical, though.
I realize I'm probably preaching to the choir, but the most ethical billionaires would have to be those who did the most good* without trampling any particular rights. Given how hard business can incentivize one or another form of such trampling, then, it would be really hard to find a billionaire with clean hands. At some point they'd have signed off on a sketchy deal, or exploited labor laws, or just hired people who did. How much of that responsibility should transfer?
You could probably get a pretty good proxy of political affiliation by asking a series of comparison questions. Ask whether a person is culpable for X, Y, Z, with decreasing levels of personal involvement. Someone who believes in holding a CEO responsible for his bottom-level managers' hiring decisions is much, much more likely to subscribe to various left-wing policy planks. Collectivism is not limited to redistribution.
Assuming OP and his buddy could agree on a standard, they could in theory go down the Forbes list and rule people out accordingly.
*Yes, yes, we also probably disagree on some key points of the "good". Not going there right now.
You’ve done a lot of venting in the past couple days. More in the past couple years. You keep showing up to bitch about the minority du jour and you demonstrate zero interest in the intended purpose of this community. We should have banned you the last few times.
Goodbye and good riddance.
Sarcasm is unbecoming.
It’s possible to build a good post around a rhetorical turn, but when the rest of your comment consists of quotes, you need to speak plainly.
how rude is it to ask
I figured we were talking about the gap between curiosity and need-to-know. I’m not going to begrudge anyone the former.
Lots of things have followed us around for just as long. Doesn’t mean asking about them is reasonable.
“Hey, is your daughter a virgin?”
“How do you feel about your foreskin?”
“But can you prove you were born a free man?”
It does.
That said, you don’t have to take the bait.
Perhaps I wasn’t clear.
Do not respond to accusations with personal attacks. Block them, address the substance, I don’t care, but do not take the opportunity to speculate on your interlocutor’s life story. Especially do not respond to a warning about personal attacks by making more guesses about what’s going on in his head.
One day ban.
Single line breaks render as sentences.
Like this.
To get a proper paragraph, include two spaces after each line.
Like so.
For a little trailing space, it’s double line breaks.
There.
Anyway, I second the Grok critics. It’s kind of like going to the tabloids for primary sources. Even if they cite something, the chances of it panning out are inversely proportional to how exciting the headline was.
I swear to god.
Kindly stop with the melodramatic callouts. Perhaps you missed the last round. If you really think Arjin is missing key information, send him a DM.
And you, @magicalkittycat. I know you were paying attention. Falling back on personal attacks does no one any favors.
Less of this, please.
It’s not even particularly egregious, and might even pass as a joke, but you’ve got something like 8 mod warnings for content-free snark. Raise the filter just a little bit.
You’re right, “know” is probably too strong.
I was reading about the growth of antebellum America and was struck by these self-reinforcing contributions. Industrialization drove women out of cottage industry and into education, which drove religious revivals, which drove temperance, which drove industry. But also they were spending more time and effort on each child, so fertility was tanking. Though actual family size fell more slowly, thanks to repeated revolutions in medicine. The boom in public education also skewed any results we might have collected from early intelligence testing.
So I don’t know that fertility was negatively correlated with IQ, just that it went down as education, investment per child, nutrition, etc. went up.
Why should the rate be .01 SD/generation? Why should it even be linear?
If the one sample set we’ve got today is a somewhat stronger negative correlation, I would expect that to extend backwards. I know that was the case in 1800s America.
I have yet to see a set in my cruises of estate sales. Clearly, that means they’re in high demand.
Though if he brings his kid, there’s an elevated risk of acquiring kitcsh.
I’ve read, possibly on the old SSC comments, an argument that Heinlein covered a ridiculous diversity of societies. No pun intended. Troopers wasn’t the exception so much as another instance of his speculative style. Unfortunately, I’m not familiar enough with his work to give a full inventory. Friday was pretty lib-soc.
Do you have an opinion on John McPhee? Levels of the Game did this for tennis. On the other hand, I’d say it still has magazine-voice. His geology books didn’t come across that way at all, though.

I guess I’m not convinced of the throughline between all four options, there.
“Leeching off the government” is the only one which involves claiming benefits that were intended for someone else. Some NGOs fall in this category. Everything else sounds like a central example of a job: someone paying you for your labor. If you’re honest and they’re satisfied with your work, how are you defecting?
More options
Context Copy link