@Throwaway05's banner p

Throwaway05


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 January 02 15:05:53 UTC

				

User ID: 2034

Throwaway05


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 January 02 15:05:53 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2034

Hell yeah man. As we say in the states: P=MD.

You can always catch up on whatever you feels is lacking once you have freedom to move, the hardest part is getting to the spot you just got to.

Scotland seems beautiful anyway.

Assuming not a joke - relativistic kill vehicles.

Unfortunately, as someone pointed out downthread, "monetizing their skills" these days increasingly means going into tech or pharma, rather than actually, y'know, treating patients.

This is a really important point in my mind, you can argue that doctors aren't the smartest people in the world but by the time you get into late training you've demonstrated that you are among the hardest working (24-36 hour shifts, 80+ hour weeks for some specialties) and best at stupid box checking.

People fuck this up constantly. Educated people. Smart people. People believe in antibiotic stewardship until they have a cold and demand antibiotics "just in case." People take medications and are told "no really tell me if you start supplements or something really bad could happen" and then something really bad happens. People are told "don't eat before your expensive, time sensitive, maybe life saving surgery" and then they eat. Sometimes they die because they eat and we can't do surgery.

See front page of meddit today for a discussion on colonoscopies.

People can't be trusted to do a good job of this, and that includes health care professionals (including doctors). Thus the waves of verification.

That's all stuff which is much amenable to discussion and debate (even if we disagree) but these are unrelated to my problem with your post which was the gross factual inaccuracies.

It's several orders of magnitude more common for a doctor to start making 250K a year at age 32 with a half million dollars in debt than it is for a doctor to be making over 750k a year, which nearly zero are doing through clinical duties alone.

Your comment, much as I loathe to use this term, is misinformation.

"What is the right amount of money for a doctor to make" is a reasonable question but it's functionally entirely unrelated to healthcare costs in America.

Do keep in mind that the UK does its own thing and doesn't map well to the process in the U.S. (or other western countries).

At an extreme example if you want to be an electrophysiologist in the U.S. you'll be doing a minimum of 16-18 years of training after high school, with many looking at 22 years. During 8 of those years you will be working 60-80 hours a week with some programs closer to 100 hours a week. Even if the years are the same you are doing twice* as much work during each year (is that sane? No. But it is).

All the while you are dealing with an average student loan debt of around 250k, with that number not counting interest or all the rich kids (who are admittedly a fair chunk) with zero debt.

If you want anybody in the U.S. at all to do that you need to offer them a pretty big carrot. And you do want them to do that - we've seen the outcome disparity between U.S. MDs and other populations (most notably of late, midlevels).

AND.

Lower quality doctors (or doctor replacement) increase overall healthcare cost due to increased unnecessary testing. Very well documented at this point.

You need to change the regulatory and malpractice environment first if you want any of this to work, which nobody seems to be interested in doing, and if you did things would cost less without coming for MD salaries at all.

*these days 1.5 times the work is much more common and realistic but that's still a fuck huge disparity.

Most European countries have 6 years of combined med school and undergrad (see: Germany) vs. 4 years of undergrad + 4 years of med school in the U.S. these days 1-2 gap years is also common, with 3-5 being uncommon but not rare (for things like PHD, MPH, MBA).

The amount of debt is important because it is relevant to the level of pushback you get for changes, and the fact that if you cut salaries by half and allow limitless importing of doctors then you will have pretty much zero people applying to med school in the U.S. overnight (and that would be the rational response). People still interested will do PA/NP school instead.

Do also keep in mind the quality difference which is real but is frequently not acknowledged.

That attitude leads to things like the opioid crisis where the rest of society is left cleaning up the mess left behind by people making questionable decisions.

A huge chunk of healthcare costs these days are associated with lifestyle related problems. That's going to get worse if you have 100k people fuck up their kidneys and need dialysis.

Negative externalities are a thing.

Pretty much everything you've said about the doctor side of things is wrong and much of it borders on malpractice. Frustratingly, I've corrected you on some of the clear matters of fact in the past and you've refused to update, so I guess this is more for the benefit of others who may be looking.

-Physician salaries are not responsible for high healthcare costs. They are a low percentage of healthcare costs. 8.6%. Half physician salaries (which nobody is suggesting and would collapse the system anyway) and you would barely make a dent in cost. Data: Stanford (SIEPR).

-Anesthesiologists do not make 700K a year. The average salary of a gas attending in the northeast is 380k. Data: MGMA survey (granted the one I have is a few years out of date).

--Can a gas attending make that much? Probably not in a desirable geographic area but if they want to work 2x full time or take a lot of weekend/holiday call they can get close. Maybe in L.A. if they do celebrity work, pain management or something like that? The ones I know who crack that level make the money off of owning something, patents, or something else of that nature, not working.

--On a more editorial note, why does gas make $$$? Gas is like being a pilot, most of the time it doesn't look like you are doing something outside of take off or landing but you get paid for the hopefully rare emergencies. Additionally procedural work reimburses well in the U.S. for historical reasons. Fix that problem if you want.

-The average physician salary is 350,000 in 2023. Not far off from Cim's range. Data: 2023 Mescape reports.

-Over half of doctors are in the "low paying" specialties where it's not uncommon for your salary to be under 200k (IM, FM, Peds, Psych). Depending on where you work and what you do you may be able to go over 500k but that's pretty much 95% percentile and involves shady cash only practice or working exclusively night shifts in Arkansas.

-No specialty makes over 800k without it being "fair." What do I mean by that? To make that much you are doing something like cash practice plastic surgery for wealthy people in LA, own and run a business (unrelated or related), have patents/high level consulting work, work 350 days a year (yeah people do do this), or are a neurosurgeon (egregiously long training, work hours, stress, and competency requirements).

-Doctors. Do. Not. Make. Millions. A. Year.

-The federal government is in charge of residency spots. However, state governments and private companies can and do make their own residency spots. We've had a bunch of recent scandals about this as the residents have been critically undereducated and frequently unhireable outside the system that trained them (specifically: HCA in Florida). Turns out medical education is complicated and you cannot just increase spots this is most true in surgical specialities which have small number of highly trained doctors, but also represent most of the specialties making the most money.

-The AMA is not a cartel. Most physicians hate the AMA and have for decades, as they've been lobbying for depressed physician salaries in the form of increased midlevel involvement (which is to the benefit of end career physicians at the expense of everyone else).

Their's a lot more to say here on things like "docs in Europe get paid less because their training is shorter and they don't have hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt" or "training quality if much higher outside the U.S., even in wealthy western countries" but this has gone on long enough.

Cim you have to reevaluate your level of knowledge on this topic because (among other things) you said "doctors should be paid $120-300k a year at the cap, with the high figure for the most elite surgeons in tough specialties" is very close to the system we already got.

Additionally doctor's wages in real terms have been decreasing for over 30 years while costs (including med school tuition) have been skyrocketing. It's driving a lot of people you want in medicine out of medicine. Just 68% of medical school graduates at Stanford went on to residency (with the majority of the rest going into tech or business instead). And that stat was in 2011, can't imagine how much worse it is now.

Tylenol would not be approved as an over the counter drug if discovered today because of how easy it is to kill yourself accidentally (or intentionally) with it.

The average person has no idea how badly many drugs can interact with each other, recreational substances, and with medical comorbidities.

And that's ignoring other problems like the people who would give themselves antibiotics for viral infections etc.

I can't possibly upvote this enough. :(

Supposedly that specific black actress has some form of connection to SBI and that's why she has been in so many games lately. She's also in many of the games that had the "female attractiveness change."

Malpractice is heavily dependent on state and specialty, can be as low as 5k-10k or as high as well into six figures (OB). Some states have caps on malpractice payouts, some everyone get sued constantly.

Loans are for 4 years undergrad + 4 years of medical school. After that you get paid while working 60-80+ hours a week (but the pay is 50-70) while in residency. Residency lasts like 3-7 years depending on the speciality, and to do some disciplines (like Cardiology) you have to do additional years of poor pay training on top of the residency.

Once an attending most jobs are 40-60 hours a week but some stay higher than that. Depending on the field you may also work weekends, nights, holidays, 24+ hour shifts, 2 weeks without a day off etc. even as a senior doctor.

It's not unreasonable for a PCP to make 180-220 a year. That's a lot of money in comparison to most jobs, but when the surgical sub specialist is making 600-800.....people follow incentives.

Note: We have orders of magnitude more doctors in primary care than the sexy big number specialties.

Being an excellent PCP is possibly the most difficult and cognitively demanding job in medicine. On top of that pay is shit, prestige is shit, so great people don't go into it but great people are needed.

Corporate pressure and increasing health problems means they have less time with patients but more to do than ever before.

It's a mess and I understand why patients feel mistreated but they also have no idea whats going on.

As for the specifics in the U.S. IM or FM can be a PCP after completing a relevant residency, with (some?) states having a process for being a "GP" with more limited scope of practice after completing certain levels of residency.

The U.S. is weird because all docs can technically do anything in medicine (unrestricted practice) but getting permission to do that in a particular facility, malpractice insurance, and getting patient's insurance to cover what you do is all complicated. Certain kinds of ethically challenged people manage.

a large number have cluster B personality disorders

Identity instability is a literal symptom of borderline. Not surprising if these people (when unstable) have trans thought content. If you throw the long COVID equivalent into your research studies, it's going to give you a ton of junk data and hide whatever thing is really going on.

I would guess a culture of "toughing it out" and "oh god we have tons of real health problems" limits the role for these softer diseases.

Also thank you for introducing me to "crore."

It is my firm belief that people with severe psychiatric disorders that appear to be permanent should essentially try the kitchen sink of pharmacology and related lifestyle alterations.

You should probably separate out things like depression and anxiety from illness like bipolar and schizophrenia. Some (considered crackpot) physicians will try and manage bipolar with therapy or recreational drugs but schizophrenia is pretty much straight up well understood pathophysiology that 100% necessitates medication management.

The stuff that can be managed conservatively rarely catches a diagnosis in those cases which does admittedly complicate the issue.

My suspicion is that this is a trans type situation. Yes there are real trans patients. Yes there are cultural contagion trans patients. Yes there are borderlines (and others) with identity instability manifesting as trans thought character.

Likewise with Long COVD et al you have a mix of those pathologies being rolled together and it really reduces clarity and makes it unclear to what extent it is a real thing. Some people likely do have mangled CNS/PNS as a result of viral illness, others are maybe looking for a more ego syntonic expression of their depressive symptoms.

I know less about fibromyalgia but my understanding is that some physicians are emphatic it's a real thing and more investigation will make real bio markers or whatever abundantly clear.

Not seeing any fibromyalgia in India is interesting but its possible that it's in some way culture-bound, or environment-bound - higher parasite burden, rougher lives may prevent the sensitization or whatever else is going on under the hood.

You may find it fruitful to read some of the work done by non-woke Psychologists and Psychiatrists (ex: Life at the Bottom by Theodore Dalrymple), if for no other reason than to go "my god other people have noticed this!"

Everybody who deals with these people has experienced this stuff but having the tools to diagnose and label what these people do is helpful (and may at times give you some insight in how to work them for your needs).

This happens a lot in our own fucking notes we used to share mission critical information with each other (called note bloat), pretty much zero reason to assume it will have the smallest usefulness for patient facing stuff (for the reasons you outline).

Additionally the level of affirmative action in medicine is extremely intense, I haven't looked at the data in a few years so I don't know where it's at now, but it used to be absurd - something like 90% percent of black med students would not have ended up in medicine if put on a fair playing field.

Not nearly as common as death by volume of paperwork, but an example of actual errors is when practice changes due to new information, and nobody updates the info sheets.

So while I sympathise, I don't know what can be done. If doctors over-warn, that triggers panic, if they don't warn, there is risk of a very severe side-effect. And yeah, you'll have patients who don't listen anyway.

Yup. :/

Pharmacists do have a helpful role here though. Specialities like Psych and Oncology have medication that is complicated and generally have the time to pause and talk through some things, but an antibiotic for an infection? PCP gonna move on to the next patient - good time for the pharmacist to do med information while dispensing.

Only allowing elective work to be done (especially risky or life altering stuff) after a longitudinal period sounds like a good step. Pretty common to do this for trans stuff but less so for things like a tummy tuck or the sterilization, which can also go wrong but we are happy to do.

I generally get the feeling the consent process exists to protect us from patients not the other way around, and longer/more clear communication may not help with that.

Written communication can be a problem sometimes though - you are going to have to write down that one of the risks is death, or other scary things and it's going to be worth it, and rare. But having that on a piece of paper that someone can stare at can be a bad thing.